Testseek.com have collected 47 expert reviews of the Samsung GT-S5670 Galaxy Fit and the average rating is 67%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samsung GT-S5670 Galaxy Fit.
(67%)
47 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
-
0 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
67010047
The editors liked
Attractive design
Smooth UI
Decent daylight camera quality
Good audio quality
240 x 320 pixels screen resolution
Accelerometer and Proximity sensor
DNSe sound enhancement
160 MB internal memory
3G connectivity
WiFi 802.11 b/g/n
WiFi hotspot
Bluetooth v2.1
2560 ? 1920 pixels camera resolution
Geo tagging
600 MHz processor
Solid build quality (except for battery cover)
Camera takes excellent still images
Android 2.2 preinstalled
The editors didn't like
Poor display performance
Display pixel dimensions limits applications that can be installed
Abstract: After unveiling a foldable smartphone, a 5G smartphone and its new flagships, Samsung also announced a new pair of wireless earbuds and a refreshed its wearable lineup. The Korean giant unveiled the new Galaxy Buds, the Galaxy Watch Active and two fitness...
Abstract: After unveiling a foldable smartphone, a 5G smartphone and its new flagships, Samsung also announced a new pair of wireless earbuds and a refreshed its wearable lineup. The Korean giant unveiled the new Galaxy Buds, the Galaxy Watch Active and two fitness...
240 x 320 pixels screen resolution, Accelerometer and Proximity sensor, DNSe sound enhancement, 160 MB internal memory, 3G connectivity, WiFi 802.11 b/g/n, WiFi hotspot, Bluetooth v2.1, 2560 ? 1920 pixels camera resolution, Geo tagging, 600 MHz processor,
Low screen resolution, Absence of Flash support in the Web browser, No secondary camera for voice calls, No designated camera key, Poor QVGA video recording, No DivX/XviD support
We have discussed quite a lot about the Samsung Galaxy Fit S5670 and inspite of that, tons of features still remain to be discussed. It is true that the Samsung Galaxy Fit S5670 has a few problems to its credit like the ones which have been mentioned abov...
The Samsung Galaxy Fit is yet another attempt by the Android army to storm the lower-end smartphone market. Placed right between the Galaxy Mini and the Galaxy Ace, the fit tries to deliver a solid smartphone performance at a very reasonable price.However...
Attractive design, smooth UI, decent daylight camera quality, good audio quality
Poor display performance, display pixel dimensions limits applications that can be installed, no camera flash, no Adobe Flash player support, web browser runs out of memory easily, poor on-screen keypads, expensive
The Samsung Galaxy Fit S5670 is priced at Rs.10,500. For that price you get a phone that tries to do a lot of things but only manages to do very few satisfactorily. If you look at it as a full-fledged Android phone then you will be disappointed and it ...
Abstract: Samsung’s Galaxy series of Android devices are not only affordable but have been enjoying quite a bit if popularity amongst the lower budget smartphone segments. The last low budget Galaxy I reviewed was the Galaxy 3 and as much as I hated the desi...
The tracker will alert you to calls and messages from your smartphone, but you can't answer calls, read or reply to messages from the tracker, You can set alarms from the tracker to wake you up –the gentle vibration will prevent accidentally waking your p
It lacks some expected features, The iOS and Android apps have different names, this made it hard to set up and the instructions weren't very concise
This is a reasonably priced and accurate fitness tracker. It was simple to use and great for those who wanted to keep an eye on their daily fitness statistics. While it claims to last up to 13 days between charges, the battery life was dependant on how of...
FM radio, low price, compact dimensions, 5MP camera,
Plasticky finish, no Flash video support, slow processor, screen lacks sharpness
Almost everything about the Fit is a compromise; it's easy to use and the camera is relatively impressive, but elsewhere it flatters to deceive. Not advanced enough for business use and not fast enough for accurate, speedy surfing, it nevertheless make...
