in.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Phones » Mobile phones » Samsung GT-S5670 Galaxy Fit



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Samsung GT-S5670 Galaxy Fit

Testseek.com have collected 47 expert reviews of the Samsung GT-S5670 Galaxy Fit and the average rating is 67%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samsung GT-S5670 Galaxy Fit.
 
(67%)
47 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
67 0 100 47

The editors liked

  • Attractive design
  • Smooth UI
  • Decent daylight camera quality
  • Good audio quality
  • 240 x 320 pixels screen resolution
  • Accelerometer and Proximity sensor
  • DNSe sound enhancement
  • 160 MB internal memory
  • 3G connectivity
  • WiFi 802.11 b/g/n
  • WiFi hotspot
  • Bluetooth v2.1
  • 2560 ? 1920 pixels camera resolution
  • Geo tagging
  • 600 MHz processor
  • Solid build quality (except for battery cover)
  • Camera takes excellent still images
  • Android 2.2 preinstalled

The editors didn't like

  • Poor display performance
  • Display pixel dimensions limits applications that can be installed
  • No camera flash
  • No Adobe Flash player support
  • Web browser runs out of memory easily
  • Poor on-screen keypads
  • Expensive
  • Low screen resolution
  • Absence of Flash support in the Web browser
  • No secondary camera for voice calls
  • No designated camera key
  • Poor QVGA video recording
  • No DivX/XviD support
  • Colours look washed out on the display
  • Battery cover is plasticy

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 3 of 5
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2011-07-11, review by: 3g.co.uk

  • Looks and feels great, decent pricetag
  • Poor screen, slow chip
  • Pros: Looks and feels great, decent pricetag Cons: Poor screen, slow chip Verdict: A handset offering recent Android OS at a decent price - but the slow chip and poor display will disappoint...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2011-07-11, review by: CNET.co.uk

  • Great 5-megapixel camera with autofocus; eye-catching design; excellent price
  • No Flash support in browser; Low-res screen
  • The Samsung Galaxy Fit looks good and offers a great camera. Its low-res screen and relatively weedy CPU are disappointing but this Android smart phone is very affordable....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2011-07-07, review by: recombu.com

  • As a mid-range budget phone that does the basics, the Samsung Galaxy Fit does the job admirably. Easy to pick up and easy to get to grips with, it’s perhaps a good option for someone who has not used a touchscreen phone before or doesn’t want or care a...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(40%)
 
  Published: 2011-07-07, Author: Jonathan , review by: whatmobile.net

  • Abstract:  Samsung has a Galaxy smartphone to suit every budget, and at the lower end of the scale is the Galaxy Fit. We’re not sure where the ‘fit’ comes from, as it’s not particularly sporty, rugged or equipped with tools to keep you fit, but it sounds impressive....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2011-11-13, review by: cellphonequick.com

  • Smooth performance, Compact, Cheap, Great camera, Larger screen than the Galaxy Mini, Attractive design,
  • Low resolution display, Poor incall quality
  • The Samsung Galaxy Fit manages to outclass the Galaxy Mini with a larger screen, better camera and more attractive appearance. In terms of raw power, though, the two phones are practically identical.PRO:Smooth performance Compact Cheap Great camera La...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-09-13, review by: phonearena.com

  • Comfortable to use, Takes good photos
  • Low resolution display, Poor incall quality
  • What we like about the Samsung GALAXY Fit is that it is comfortable to use and feels good in the hand. Besides that, it has every connectivity feature that a novice smartphone user would ever need. Photos taken with the GALAXY Fit look surprisingly go...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2011-07-07, review by: mobilechoiceuk.com

  • Great look and feel. Good price...
  • Crummy display, slow processor, some dodgy detailsLook and Feel...
  • An affordable phone with recent Android software and stylish looks – but the low-resolution screen and slow processor may disappoint ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2011-05-20, review by: brighthub.com

  • Overall, the Samsung Galaxy Fit ranks in as a solid "Average" entry level smartphone. While the hardware specifications are a bit lacking and slightly disappointing, the rest of the feature set makes up for it. Samsung may have made a mistake an...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2011-02-21, review by: phonearena.com

  • Abstract:  The successor of the may be the Sammy phone everyone is talking about, but that didn't stop the Korean manufacturer to announce four low- to mid-end GALAXY handsets - the , the , the and the one you are reading about right now - the .The last time Sa...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2011-03-03, review by: cgena.com

  • Great functionality
  • Average screen quality
  • Not one of the best or the popular phones which can dominate the entry-level market range, the Samsung Galaxy Fit S5670 is still a great Android-based phone option. With its adequate amount of features, excellent functionality, and affordable price, ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(94%)
    page 3 of 5 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×