in.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Phones » Mobile phones » Samsung GT-S5670 Galaxy Fit



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Samsung GT-S5670 Galaxy Fit

Testseek.com have collected 47 expert reviews of the Samsung GT-S5670 Galaxy Fit and the average rating is 67%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samsung GT-S5670 Galaxy Fit.
 
(67%)
47 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
67 0 100 47

The editors liked

  • Attractive design
  • Smooth UI
  • Decent daylight camera quality
  • Good audio quality
  • 240 x 320 pixels screen resolution
  • Accelerometer and Proximity sensor
  • DNSe sound enhancement
  • 160 MB internal memory
  • 3G connectivity
  • WiFi 802.11 b/g/n
  • WiFi hotspot
  • Bluetooth v2.1
  • 2560 ? 1920 pixels camera resolution
  • Geo tagging
  • 600 MHz processor
  • Solid build quality (except for battery cover)
  • Camera takes excellent still images
  • Android 2.2 preinstalled

The editors didn't like

  • Poor display performance
  • Display pixel dimensions limits applications that can be installed
  • No camera flash
  • No Adobe Flash player support
  • Web browser runs out of memory easily
  • Poor on-screen keypads
  • Expensive
  • Low screen resolution
  • Absence of Flash support in the Web browser
  • No secondary camera for voice calls
  • No designated camera key
  • Poor QVGA video recording
  • No DivX/XviD support
  • Colours look washed out on the display
  • Battery cover is plasticy

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 2 of 5
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2011-10-25, review by: tech-reviews.co.uk

  • Smooth performance, Compact, Cheap, Great camera, Larger screen than the Galaxy Mini, Attractive design,
  • The Samsung Galaxy Fit has proven to be a great little phone, even though it lacks a higher resolution, better graphics and internal storage.However, for the small sum of £100, you can’t go wrong really.Thanks to its attractive design, great camera and...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2011-10-04, review by: wired.co.uk

  • Stylish look, good quality 5MP camera,
  • Poor screen, slow processor, old version of Android
  • There's no getting around the fact that the Samsung Galaxy Fit is an entry-level smart phone with a slow processor, outdated OS and a low-res screen that lacks the definition of many of its rivals. It does however have a better camera than you might ex...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2011-09-28, Author: LGR , review by: gadgetdaily.xyz

  • Abstract:  Small in size, the Samsung Galaxy Fit is well designed for smaller, childlike hands. The black and silver chassis design is a little old-fashioned, but it feels robust enough. The 3.3-inch screen is large enough to cater for web browsing and video viewing...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(40%)
 
  Published: 2011-09-13, review by: techradar.com

  • Settings area on main screen, Small and light, Easy access to task manager, Camera quite serviceable, FM radio
  • Poor battery life, Camera lacks flash, Low-resolution screen, No Flash support, Short on internal memory
  • The affordable smartphone brings nothing new to the Android party...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2011-08-25, Author: Niall , review by: trustedreviews.com

  • Clear call quality, Good camera by budget smartphone standards, Classy design
  • Processor isn't all that quick, Low resolution screen, Doesn't support Flash

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2011-08-23, Author: Andy , review by: gadgetdaily.xyz

  • Abstract:  Even by smartphone standards the Samsung Galaxy Fit has an odd name. It is the kind of name that implies some sort of special features – fitness related features. And as there is a GPS on board, and the Android Market has a whole host of tracking apps ava...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2011-08-18, review by: fonehome.co.uk

  • All in all, the Samsung Galaxy Fit is another fine addition to the swelling affordable Android market. It has a feel and build quality that’s uncommon in this price range, while it performs well enough in most of the key areas.The only thing that reall...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2011-08-11, review by: theregister.co.uk

  • The Samsung Fit is a low-end Android with a poor screen and underpowered processor, but just about redeems itself with a decent camera. ® More Budget Android Smartphone ReviewsVodafone SmartHTC SalsaLG Optimus OneTen… budget Android smartphonesMotorol...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(65%)
 
  Published: 2011-07-30, review by: expertreviews.co.uk

  • It may have a low-resolution screen, but the Galaxy Fit makes the most of its low specification hardware. It's a bargain ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2011-07-13, review by: pocket-lint.com

  • Affordable, camera works well, performs core functions well enough
  • Low resolution screen, screen reflections, battery life
  • Although basic functionality works well, the Samsung Galaxy Fit is let down by the screen, both in terms of the resolution and the reflective finish, so it’s well worth looking around before parting with your cash...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
    page 2 of 5 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×