in.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » Intel » Intel Core i5 7500 3.4GHz Socket 1151



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel Core i5 7500 3.4GHz Socket 1151

Testseek.com have collected 98 expert reviews of the Intel Core i5 7500 3.4GHz Socket 1151 and the average rating is 77%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core i5 7500 3.4GHz Socket 1151.
Award: Most Awarded January 2018
January 2018
 
(77%)
98 Reviews
Users
(89%)
1963 Reviews
77 0 100 98

 

Reviews

page 1 of 10
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2016-12-26, Author: John , review by: eteknix.com

  • 4K HEVC 10-bit decode/encode, Commendable iGPU performance, Employs a modest operational voltage range, Intel Optane technology has so much potential, Low power consumption, On-par with a stock i5-7600K in games, Superb memory performance, Supports HDCP 2
  • Doesn’t provide a reason to upgrade in a hurry, No IPC improvements over Skylake, Neutral, Pricing is key because the i5-7600K offers more in the long-term, “The Intel Core i5-7500 is a solid choice for gamers not overly concerned with overclocking and wa
  • PricingUnfortunately, Intel hasn't disclosed any information at this time regarding the official Kaby Lake prices. Therefore, it's difficult to analyse the value proposition and compare the price to performance ratio against previous generation products...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-07-27, review by: armchairempire.com

  • Cheapest among all Core i5 processors that can match up to the big CPUs, Clock speed helps it manage demanding tasks better than lower costing CPUs, Well balanced single core and multi-thread performance, Costs a lot cheaper than a performance grade Core
  • Compared to the 6th generation processors, the performance jump is nominal at best, Could have helped if Intel gave a little more Turbo Boost, Should You Consider This CPU
  • The Core i5 7500 in our opinion is the most game-centric Intel processor. Yes, it suffers in a few applications, can't match up to higher priced CPUs and lacks more than 4 threads but in games none of this matters as it gives you the exact same performanc...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(82%)
 
  Published: 2017-10-30, Author: SKYMTL , review by: hardwarecanucks.com

  • Abstract:  I'm going to start this article off with a simple number: five. Not only is that the number of months it has taken AMD to effectively turn the x86 processor world on its ear, but that's also the number of distinct model families that they've introduced...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-10, Author: SKYMTL , review by: hardwarecanucks.com

  • Looking back at how things played out over the course of this review, I have no doubt it will be one of the most hotly debated articles that I’ve written in the last few months, maybe even the last year. There’s no denying that the Zen architecture has pr...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2019-02-03, Author: Christoph , review by: computerbild.de

  • Abstract:  Bei neuen Spitzenmodellen reicht oft nur Geduld, um das Smartphone unter 500 Euro zu bekommen.2018 erklommen die Preise für Top-Smartphones neue Regionen. Das auffälligste Beispiel liefert Apple: Das günstigste aktuelle iPhone beginnt bei 849 Euro...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-12-22, Author: Ingolf , review by: computerbild.de

  • Mit gleich 32 beziehungsweise 18 Rechenkernen und stolzen Preisen von 1.800 Euro teilen sich AMDs Threadripper Ryzen 2990WX und Intels Core i9-7980XE den COMPUTER BILD-Testsieg. Damit kommen sie aber nur für Enthusiasten mit dickem Geldbeutel infrage...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-12-03, Author: Florian , review by: computerbild.de

  • Mit gleich 32 beziehungsweise 18 Rechenkernen und stolzen Preisen von 1.800 Euro teilen sich AMDs Threadripper Ryzen 2990WX und Intels Core i9-7980XE den COMPUTER BILD-Testsieg. Damit kommen sie aber nur für Enthusiasten mit dickem Geldbeutel infrage. Ein...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-11-20, Author: Igor , review by: tomshw.de

  • Die schlechte Nachricht vorab: DIE beste CPU gibt es als Allgemeinaussage so eigentlich nicht, wenn man alle Facetten wie Anwendungszweck, tatsächlich benötigte Performance, Gesamtkonzeption des PCs und das eigene Budget mit einbezieht. Die für einen und...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-05-05, review by: Pcwelt.de

  • Abstract:  AMD versus Intel - so spannend war es schon lange nicht mehr bei den Desktop-Prozessoren. Wir haben die wichtigsten Modelle der aktuellen CPU-Generationen AMD Ryzen und Intel Kaby Lake sowie das Flaggschiff Core i7-6950X im großen Vergleichs-Test.Jahrelan...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-05-03, Author: Nils , review by: gamestar.de

  • vier Kerne, hohe Spieleleistung, hohe Anwendungsleistung, relativ niedrige Leistungsaufnahme unter Last, niedrige Temperaturen unter Last
  • keine virtuelle Kernverdoppelung, kein freier Multiplikator, keine Quad-Channel-Unterstützung
  • Nils Raettig: Der Core i5 7500 von Intel hat im Test mit ganz ähnlichen Problemen wie der Core i5 7600K zu kämpfen. Mangelnde Spieleleistung gehört aktuell zwar nicht dazu, außerdem fällt der Performance-Unterschied gegenüber dem 40 Euro teureren Core i5...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(85%)
    page 1 of 10 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 ... 10   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×