in.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Phones » Mobile phones » Samsung SGH-M110 Solid



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Samsung SGH-M110 Solid

Testseek.com have collected 29 expert reviews of the Samsung SGH-M110 Solid and the average rating is 59%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samsung SGH-M110 Solid.
 
(59%)
29 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
59 0 100 29

 

Reviews

page 1 of 3
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2008-06-27, Author: Sandra , review by: CNET.co.uk

  • External casing; resistant to water splashes and some knocks and drops
  • Entry-level features; no PC synchronisation; VGA camera; small screen
  • This is no smart phone, which may limit its appeal, but the Samsung Solid could fit the bill if you need a phone that can cope with dust, dirt, water and occasional drops ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(63%)
 
  Published: 2008-06-16, review by: itreviews.com

  • Abstract:  The Samsung Solid is a long way from the cutting edge in features terms, and is probably best suited to use as a second mobile for those challenging outdoor activities, rather than your main phone. Those fancying it as an everyday phone will have to s...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-05-01, review by: zdnet.co.uk

  • Long battery life, Rugged external casing, Resistant to water splashes and some knocks and drops
  • Entrylevel features, No PC synchronisation, VGA camera, Small screen
  • This is no smartphone, which may limit its appeal, but the Samsung Solid could fit the bill if you need a phone that can cope with dust, dirt, water and occasional drops...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(63%)
 
  Published: 2008-04-23, review by: theregister.co.uk

  • We applaud Samsung for its ruthless, no-compromise back-to-basics thinking with the M110. Its as tough as old boots, has a battery that lasts longer than an English winter and can be had for less than £50 pay-as-you-go. It may lack that last degree ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2008-03-04, review by: techradar.com

  • Dust, water and shock resistant, Solid but light feel, Simple, straightforward controls
  • Basic set of features, Basic VGA camera, Chunky build, Small display
  • When something claims to be tough our first reaction tends to be "we’ll see about that."Samsung’s Solid makes much of its strong points – that is, that it’s capable of withstanding a bit of bashing and splashing that would floor le...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2008-01-18, review by: T3.com

  • The fact that its indestructible, Torch, Battery life
  • Looks, Weak camera
  • Quirky and fun. Run it over with your car, burn it, but dont expect it to use it as a phone.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(40%)
 
  Published: 2006-01-01, review by: 3g.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Both the Solid and Toughphone are not going to be phones that appeal to those that want the latest high-spec features. Rather they are built for the labourer or extreme sportsman; folk who need to know their handset can withstand a bit of rough and tum...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(40%)
 
  Published: 2008-04-13, Author: Sandra , review by: trustedreviews.com

  • Abstract:  Sometimes only the toughest phone will do. Even if you generally like to use a stylish and desirable mobile, there may be times when you don't trust your pride and joy to the prevailing conditions. If you are out on a cycling trip or on a long hike with u...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2008-02-08, review by: mobilechoiceuk.com

  • More features and lighter than the JCB Toughphone.
  • The simplest of tasks, unlocking the keypad, is beyond annoying.Look and Feel
  • Ultimately the Samsung Solid disappoints. We were unable to test the handset as rigorously as we would have liked and are therefore unsure how solid it actually is. It may have more features than the Toughphone, but these fail to mask its shortcomings, an

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(40%)
 
  Published: 2008-07-17, review by: goodgearguide.com.au

  • Dust and water resistant (meeting IEC standards), rubberised design, excellent call quality, flashlight, Bluetooth, FM radio
  • Mediocre display, poor tactility on keypad and controls, basic list of features
  • The M110’s list of features is as basic as they come. However, this isn’t too much of an issue for a handset aimed at tradespeople. This is a phone that will take a beating and provide excellent call quality in the process. ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
    page 1 of 3 « Previous   1 2 3   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×