in.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Phones » Mobile phones » Samsung GT-I9300 Galaxy S3



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Samsung GT-I9300 Galaxy S3

Testseek.com have collected 993 expert reviews of the Samsung GT-I9300 Galaxy S3 and the average rating is 87%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samsung GT-I9300 Galaxy S3.
Award: Editor’s Choice June 2012
June 2012
 
(87%)
993 Reviews
Users
(93%)
13 Reviews
87 0 100 993

The editors liked

  • The phone looks and feels great. It's smooth like a polished stone
  • But very light. Samsung corrected some of the biggest mistakes on the Galaxy Nexus. For starters
  • The camera is absolutely terrific. Photos were incredibly sharp and detailed
  • And colors
  • Android 4.0 (Inline for Android 4.1 Jelly Bean update in AugustSeptember)
  • 4.8inch screen
  • Quadcore 1.4 GHz Exynos 4212 processor
  • Great storage options
  • 16 GB to 64 GB
  • Good display resolution
  • Powerful processor
  • 4G LTE connectivity
  • High end cameras
  • Brilliant screen
  • Nifty software tweaks
  • Unmatched performance
  • Extensive multimedia support.
  • Boasts of sensors such as accelerometer
  • Gyro
  • RGB sensor
  • Proximity
  • Compass and barometer
  • Loaded with latest MP3 and MP4 players to enable music playing for the users
  • Equipped with a CPU of Quadcore 1.4 GHz CortexA9 and GPU of Mali400MP
  • The user can
  • Astonishing HD Screen
  • Fastest Smart Phone 
  • Exceptional 8 Megapixel camera
  • High speed processor
  • Most powerful Android smartphone in the market
  • Brilliant display
  • Good battery life
  • Considering the power available
  • We feel it is built well
  • Excellent camera
  • TouchWiz has evolved into the slickest UI around
  • 3G connectivity
  • Android 2.1 OS
  • SWYPE input
  • Quad Core 1.4 GHz processor
  • Android Ice Cream sandwich
  • Advanced gesture control features
  • Superfast performance
  • Superb battery life
  • Great user interface

The editors didn't like

  • We liked how HTC just lightly augmented Ice Cream Sandwich with little improvements here and there. Samsung went with the more is more approach
  • And the Galaxy S III suffers for it. The TouchWiz UI is not as intuitive as it could be
  • And it often adds mor
  • Plastic Built
  • Pricey
  • Overheating
  • Average battery capacity
  • Uncomfortable for onehanded use
  • Allplastic body
  • SVoice is worse than Siri
  • All Plastic body but better than SII
  • Dedicated Camera Key is Missing
  • No microSIM Slot
  • S Voice need some improvement
  • The Mali 400 GPU of this gadget is not very updated
  • 12 MP Camera expected but it has only 8 MP (Not impressive)
  • Subjective design 
  • Too big to handle
  • S Voice not optimized
  • S-Voice does not have any sense of humour
  • May be too big for some users
  • Does clearly heat up under most usage scenarios
  • No video calling camera
  • No flash in the camera
  • Plasticky build quality
  • S Voice just takes voice commands
  • Does not chit chat
  • High price
  • Stale looks
  • S Voice disappoints
  • Propriety HDMI

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 33 of 100
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2013-04-19, Author: Andrei , review by: productfeedback.com.au

  • Abstract:  Samsung Galaxy S4 vs Galaxy S3...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-03-05, Author: Staff , review by: bit.com.au

  • A superb screen, lots of power, innovative software and a reasonable price on contract mean that the Samsung Galaxy S III still retains a high rating. Read the review.PerformanceBattery LifeFeatures & DesignValue for MoneyOverallSpecs$560 AUD(pricing info...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(83%)
 
  Published: 2012-12-20, review by: techradar.com/au/

  • Excellent battery life, Superb screen, Quad core speed, Top media management
  • Subjective design, S Voice not optimised
  • If you've come straight here and looked at the score, let us put it into some kind of context for you: we agonised fabout whether this was another five star phone in the same mould as the Samsung Galaxy S2 - but simply put, it doesn't have the same wow f...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2012-11-26, Author: Renai , review by: delimiter.com.au

  • When we wrote our initial review of the original Samsung Galaxy S III back in August this year (remember, this was before the iPhone 5 launched, but after the HTC One XL had landed), we rated the handset as the best smartphone available in Australia at t...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-24, review by: techradar.com/au/

  • Insanely fast Superb screen Quadcore goodness Jelly Bean out of the box
  • Battery life S Voice still useless Subjective design
  • The choice between a 3G Samsung Galaxy S3 and a 4G version is actually quite a simple one. It all comes down to how you answer the question, "Do I need speed or staying power from my smartphone?" If having access to information immediately at any cost is...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2012-10-22, Author: Ross , review by: goodgearguide.com.au

  • Excellent 4G speeds, Slick and fast software, Same great display and design
  • Mediocre battery life, Can't edit home screen dock
  • The Samsung Galaxy S III 4G takes all that we loved from the original Galaxy S III and adds 4G network capability. It certainly achieves impressive, super fast data speeds on the Telstra and Optus 4G networks and the latest software is as fast and smooth...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2012-10-10, review by: cravingtech.com

  • The Samsung Galaxy S3 is definitely the best Android smartphone at this stage, no questions about that (unless if you prefer a much larger screen size like the Samsung Galaxy Note 2). It’s fast, gives a smooth experience on Android 4.0 ICS, beautiful s...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-08, Author: Luke , review by: gizmodo.com.au

  • This is the Galaxy S III we should have got back in June. I'll admit that Jelly Bean wasn't a thing then, but we shouldn't have had to wait for it as long as we did. Same thing with 4G. Telstra — a major launch partner for the Galaxy S III — had a 4G netw...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-10-05, review by: cnet.com.au

  • Same great Galaxy S3 design. Great 4.7-inch screen. 4G data speeds
  • 4G heavily impacts battery life. No HDMI port
  • Samsung has slipped 4G into the GS3 mix, but sacrificed battery greatly in the process. This is the still same great phone we saw earlier in the year, but the shorter battery cycles will be a deal breaker for many....

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(75%)
 
  Published: 2012-09-01, Author: Greg , review by: androidaustralia.com.au

  • Fast as a bullet, Amazing screen resolution and brightness, Fantastic camera optics, fast focus, Slim and light, Great audio quality
  • Poor call quality, Poor build quality, Screen is useless in sunlight, Battery charges slowly
  • Overall, this phone is a great phone. It is fast, responsive and has some amazing new technologies in it that we will see become part of our every day life very soon. Gaming and video are immersive and smooth, and the camera is crisp and fast. But it is n...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 33 of 100 « Previous   1 ... 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 ... 100   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×