in.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Phones » Mobile phones » Samsung GT-I9300 Galaxy S3



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Samsung GT-I9300 Galaxy S3

Testseek.com have collected 993 expert reviews of the Samsung GT-I9300 Galaxy S3 and the average rating is 87%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samsung GT-I9300 Galaxy S3.
Award: Editor’s Choice June 2012
June 2012
 
(87%)
993 Reviews
Users
(93%)
13 Reviews
87 0 100 993

The editors liked

  • The phone looks and feels great. It's smooth like a polished stone
  • But very light. Samsung corrected some of the biggest mistakes on the Galaxy Nexus. For starters
  • The camera is absolutely terrific. Photos were incredibly sharp and detailed
  • And colors
  • Android 4.0 (Inline for Android 4.1 Jelly Bean update in AugustSeptember)
  • 4.8inch screen
  • Quadcore 1.4 GHz Exynos 4212 processor
  • Great storage options
  • 16 GB to 64 GB
  • Good display resolution
  • Powerful processor
  • 4G LTE connectivity
  • High end cameras
  • Brilliant screen
  • Nifty software tweaks
  • Unmatched performance
  • Extensive multimedia support.
  • Boasts of sensors such as accelerometer
  • Gyro
  • RGB sensor
  • Proximity
  • Compass and barometer
  • Loaded with latest MP3 and MP4 players to enable music playing for the users
  • Equipped with a CPU of Quadcore 1.4 GHz CortexA9 and GPU of Mali400MP
  • The user can
  • Astonishing HD Screen
  • Fastest Smart Phone 
  • Exceptional 8 Megapixel camera
  • High speed processor
  • Most powerful Android smartphone in the market
  • Brilliant display
  • Good battery life
  • Considering the power available
  • We feel it is built well
  • Excellent camera
  • TouchWiz has evolved into the slickest UI around
  • 3G connectivity
  • Android 2.1 OS
  • SWYPE input
  • Quad Core 1.4 GHz processor
  • Android Ice Cream sandwich
  • Advanced gesture control features
  • Superfast performance
  • Superb battery life
  • Great user interface

The editors didn't like

  • We liked how HTC just lightly augmented Ice Cream Sandwich with little improvements here and there. Samsung went with the more is more approach
  • And the Galaxy S III suffers for it. The TouchWiz UI is not as intuitive as it could be
  • And it often adds mor
  • Plastic Built
  • Pricey
  • Overheating
  • Average battery capacity
  • Uncomfortable for onehanded use
  • Allplastic body
  • SVoice is worse than Siri
  • All Plastic body but better than SII
  • Dedicated Camera Key is Missing
  • No microSIM Slot
  • S Voice need some improvement
  • The Mali 400 GPU of this gadget is not very updated
  • 12 MP Camera expected but it has only 8 MP (Not impressive)
  • Subjective design 
  • Too big to handle
  • S Voice not optimized
  • S-Voice does not have any sense of humour
  • May be too big for some users
  • Does clearly heat up under most usage scenarios
  • No video calling camera
  • No flash in the camera
  • Plasticky build quality
  • S Voice just takes voice commands
  • Does not chit chat
  • High price
  • Stale looks
  • S Voice disappoints
  • Propriety HDMI

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 32 of 100
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2012-05-16, review by: phonearena.com

  • Abstract:  The HTC One X was the first new-generation Android smartphone to come out this year. It introduced us to a new kind of Android experience – one powered by an ultra-fast quad-core processor. Moreover, it helped HTC become relevant again, after a brief ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-05-15, review by: phonearena.com

  • Superfluid performance, Refined user experience, S Voice natural language recognition
  • Camera photos tend to be a bit overexposed, No premium materials used in its construction
  • The Samsung Galaxy S III is a spectacular phone. A big part of what makes it spectacular is its incredible specs sheet. Yeah, although its specs can easily be rivaled by strong competitors like the HTC One X, which also has a quad-core processor and t...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(93%)
 
  Published: 2012-05-12, review by: mobile-review.com US

  • Abstract:  ATTENTION. This article is not a detailed review, but a first, albeit a very meticulous look at the phone and its capabilities. We are planning to publish a full review within a week. Sections of he article will expand courtesy of new photos, compar...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-05-09, review by: techreviewsource.com

  • Abstract:  NEW ORLEANS—Samsung's Galaxy S III has a lot going on. It's not just another big smartphone, although it is, indeed, quite a big smartphone. It's full of new software enhancing the Android 4.0 experience, stuff that it takes a little while to check out.Yo...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-05-06, review by: t3me.com

  • Abstract:  The successor to the Samsung Galaxy S2, the new handset sports a massive 4.8-inch screen, a quad-core processor and a wide range of other interesting features on board. As the new top-tier Android phone on the block, the S3 is set to go head to head with...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-05-03, Author: Sam , review by: androidauthority.com

  • Again, thank you to those of you who viewed the live blog, and also thank you for bringing Android Authority its most number of of readers yet. Everything we do here is for you, our readers. I've just gotten home from the event, and it's 01:26 now. To...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2012-05-03, Author: Dragan , review by: brighthand.com

  • It could be said that Samsung has just presented a smartphone that offers the best of what the competition is offering and a tad bit more. It will surely secure many purchasers, and guarantee even greater success than recorded by its two Galaxy S predeces...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-08-12, review by: gsmarena.com

  • Abstract:  And we’re across the finish line. The two Galaxies performed very well for their relatively low standing in the Android world. The only feature that was consistently a problem is the screen – WQVGA is just not enough for a 3.2” screen. Other than that...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-09-04, review by: goodgearguide.com.au

  • Abstract:  When Samsung launched its popular Galaxy S III Android smartphone in Australia back in May, the company said it was "confident" the lack of a 4G model wouldn't hinder sales of the 3G version. A little over three months later, a 4G version of the Galaxy S ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-05-04, review by: goodgearguide.com.au

  • Abstract:  Samsung has finally lifted the lid on its much anticipated Galaxy S III Android phone. It boasts a 4.8in Super AMOLED HD display and an 8-megapixel camera that captures 1080p HD video, but largely focuses on software innovation in a bid to push ahead of t...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 32 of 100 « Previous   1 ... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 ... 100   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×