Testseek.com have collected 32 expert reviews of the Fujitsu ScanSnap SV600 and the average rating is 80%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Fujitsu ScanSnap SV600.
February 2014
(80%)
32 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
ScanSnap SV600 is a perfect scanner for SOHO, Professionals (CAs, lawyers etc.), Libraries of schools and universities as its compact and takes only 3 seconds to scan almost anything.Till now we have seen various scanners, but FUJITSU's ScanSnap SV600 is...
Published: 2014-02-01, Author: Jon , review by: pcworld.in
Abstract: The Fujitsu ScanSnap SV600 overhead scanner is must-see technology. Priced at $800, it's too expensive for most users, but the way it scans objects placed in front of it with nothing more than a bar of light is simply cool to watch.It scans without touchi...
Abstract: This unique scanner-camera takes up a lot less space than an A3 flatbed and can scan thick books and other non-flat objects – but the quality lets it down. We first came across the Fujitsu ScanSnap SV600 in an unusual way, noticing its use in creating a...
The SV600 isn't perhaps a mainstream product - it's too pricey for that. However, the sheer range of materials it can scan, and the quality with which it can scan them, makes it an outstanding product in its field. If you work in an environment where you...
Was this review helpful?
(80%)
Published: 2014-12-19, Author: M. , review by: pcmag.com
Abstract: The Fujitsu ScanSnap SV600 ($795) is an unusual scanner. Built with an overhead scan unit. It literally offers a different perspective than a flatbed, looking down at a scan area instead of up through a glass platen. Although one of the best reasons to co...
Can scan virtually anything, Very small footprint, Fast
Not great at correcting for page distortion or curvature, Not suited to scanning transparencies, Expensive
It looks like a table lamp, but the ScanSnap SV600 scans material quickly and efficiently, and it takes up minimal space when not in use. It's also a hoot to watch, but page curvature is a problem....
