Testseek.com have collected 39 expert reviews of the Samsung ML-1630 Series and the average rating is 74%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samsung ML-1630 Series.
(74%)
39 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
-
0 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
74010039
The editors liked
Attractive design
Great print quality.
Clear prints
Quick document printouts
The editors didn't like
The competition offers faster prints and more features for the same price.
The competition offers faster prints and more features for the same price.
The Samsung ML-1630 cant claim to be the best value among mono laser printers--the competition offers faster print speeds and more features--but the ML-1630s aesthetic appeal is undeniable.
Abstract: Samsung has clearly thought hard about the aesthetics of the elegant ML 1630W laser printer, so its odd that it has lumbered it with such a cumbersome name. Regardless, this will sit well alongside the latest Macs, and its modest dimensions mean it wi...
Abstract: We reviewed the USB-only version of this mono laser printer, the ML-1630, in Whats New, Shopper 240. This new version, the ML-1630W, costs less than its predecessor did when it was launched and it has extra features, the most significant of which a...
Samsung has succeeded in producing a better-looking laser printer than most. The print quality’s good, it prints reasonably quickly and quietly and is easy to maintain. However, the page cost is high and its paper tray capacity is low, so it’s...
Abstract: In the gadget family, printers are seen as the boring uncle who talks in a monotonous voice about how Tayto cost 2p when he was a lad. So it’s inevitable that buying a new one to meet your business needs can seem like an unsavoury task – but w...
The very stylish Samsung ML-1630 flouts the monochrome laser printers reputation for dull efficiency. Its a decent machine whose low-capacity input tray and pricey toner restrict it to individuals or small offices that wouldnt mind sacrificing some...
