in.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » Intel » Intel Core Ultra 7 265K 3.9GHz Socket 1851



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel Core Ultra 7 265K 3.9GHz Socket 1851

Testseek.com have collected 6 expert reviews of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K 3.9GHz Socket 1851 and the average rating is 65%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core Ultra 7 265K 3.9GHz Socket 1851.
 
(65%)
6 Reviews
Users
(100%)
2 Reviews
65 0 100 6

 

Reviews

page 1 of 1
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2024-10-24, Author: Peter , review by: eteknix.com

  • There's a lot different about the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K CPU compared to the previous 14th Gen CPUs, but largely, they sum up to a fairly similar experience in our benchmarks. There are obvious benefits from the improved I/O of the new chipsets, and the...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2024-10-27, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com

  • Abstract:  The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K can be considered the successor to the Core i7-14700K. It will be interesting to see how these two compare and, of course, how the 265K stacks up against AMD's offerings.The Core Ultra 7 265K features 8 P-Cores with 8 threads...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(65%)
 
  Published: 2024-10-24, Author: W1zzard , review by: techpowerup.com

  • Excellent application performance, beats Ryzen 9 9900X, Solid pricing, given the performance, Eight Lion Cove P-Cores, just 4 E-Cores missing compared to 285K, Good energy efficiency, Easy to keep cool, PCIe Gen 5 SSD without compromising GPU bandwidth, O
  • High price for a "7"-positioned CPU, Gaming performance lower than expected, slower than Raptor Lake, Some games and applications aren't currently performing well at all, Requires new motherboard with Socket LGA1851, No more support for DDR4 memory, No su
  • The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K will sell for $395. Excellent application performance, beats Ryzen 9 9900X Solid pricing, given the performance Eight Lion Cove P-Cores, just 4 E-Cores missing compared to 285K Good energy efficiency Easy to keep cool PCIe Gen...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2024-10-31, Author: Sébastien , review by: cowcotland.com

  • Scores décents, Nette amélioration de la consommation, Puce graphique compatible 8K, Ajout d’un NPU
  • mais en dessous des attentes
  • À l’instar des Core Ultra 9 285K et Core Ultra 5 245K, le Core Ultra 7 265K n’a pas réussi à se démarquer, en partie en raison de l’abandon de l’hyperthreading et de l’accent mis sur la réduction de la consommation pour l'ensemble de la gamme. La conclusi...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2024-10-29, review by: Lesnumeriques.com

  • Abstract:  ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2024-10-25, review by: mobile01.com

  • Abstract:  Intel Core Ultra 7 265K 處理器。 在看過旗艦款 Core Ultra 9 285K 處理器的效能測試後(請見: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 處理器效能實測 多核心效能猛進但仍需軟體更新的轉身之作 ),接下來陳拔要來開箱測試的是這次 Intel 客戶運算事業群副總裁 Robert Hallock 認為是 CP 值最高的 Core Ultra 7 265K 處理器,雖說這次 Intel 官方並沒有提供這顆處理器的測試版本,不過陳拔還是透過其他管道借來一顆進行測試(感...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 1 of 1  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×