in.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » Intel » Intel Core Ultra 7 265K 3.9GHz Socket 1851



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel Core Ultra 7 265K 3.9GHz Socket 1851

Testseek.com have collected 13 expert reviews of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K 3.9GHz Socket 1851 and the average rating is 78%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core Ultra 7 265K 3.9GHz Socket 1851.
 
(78%)
13 Reviews
Users
(97%)
7 Reviews
78 0 100 13

 

Reviews

page 1 of 2
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2024-10-24, Author: Peter , review by: eteknix.com

  • There's a lot different about the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K CPU compared to the previous 14th Gen CPUs, but largely, they sum up to a fairly similar experience in our benchmarks. There are obvious benefits from the improved I/O of the new chipsets, and the...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2024-10-27, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com

  • Abstract:  The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K can be considered the successor to the Core i7-14700K. It will be interesting to see how these two compare and, of course, how the 265K stacks up against AMD's offerings.The Core Ultra 7 265K features 8 P-Cores with 8 threads...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(65%)
 
  Published: 2024-10-24, Author: W1zzard , review by: techpowerup.com

  • Excellent application performance, beats Ryzen 9 9900X, Solid pricing, given the performance, Eight Lion Cove P-Cores, just 4 E-Cores missing compared to 285K, Good energy efficiency, Easy to keep cool, PCIe Gen 5 SSD without compromising GPU bandwidth, O
  • High price for a "7"-positioned CPU, Gaming performance lower than expected, slower than Raptor Lake, Some games and applications aren't currently performing well at all, Requires new motherboard with Socket LGA1851, No more support for DDR4 memory, No su
  • The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K will sell for $395. Excellent application performance, beats Ryzen 9 9900X Solid pricing, given the performance Eight Lion Cove P-Cores, just 4 E-Cores missing compared to 285K Good energy efficiency Easy to keep cool PCIe Gen...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2024-12-03, review by: geeknetic.es

  • Muy rápido en juegos, Mismos P-Core que el 285K y casi igual de rápidos, Buenas temperaturas y capacidad de overclock
  • La falta de hyperthreading hace que en benchmarks multi-núcleo no haya grandes diferencias de rendimiento generacional
  • Uno de mis procesadores favoritos de las últimas generaciones, como ya he mencionado durante esta review, es el Intel Core i7-14700K. Esa mejora en el número de hilos de proceso en los núcleos E le sentó de maravilla, y esto mismo se aprecia en esta gener...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(96%)
 
  Published: 2024-11-15, review by: profesionalreview.com

  • excelente comportamiento en pbp=125w, la tecnologÍa singlecore mejora el ipc en procesos, supera al 9900x, arquitectura de 3 nm con npu integrada, capacidad para ram, plataforma z890 con gran conectividad ideal para creadores
  • downgrade en desempeÑo gaming, mejor eficiencia, pero no tanto como zen 5, la npu e igpu podrÍan ser mÁs potentes, temperaturas de stock elevadas
  • acerca del Intel Core Ultra 7 265KLlegamos al final de esta review técnica del segundo procesador más potente de la arquitectura Arrow Lake, el cual cumple en rendimiento bruto, pero se desinfla un poco en gaming frente a su rival de AMD y el propio Ultr...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(88%)
 
  Published: 2024-10-31, Author: Sébastien , review by: cowcotland.com

  • Scores décents, Nette amélioration de la consommation, Puce graphique compatible 8K, Ajout d’un NPU
  • mais en dessous des attentes
  • À l’instar des Core Ultra 9 285K et Core Ultra 5 245K, le Core Ultra 7 265K n’a pas réussi à se démarquer, en partie en raison de l’abandon de l’hyperthreading et de l’accent mis sur la réduction de la consommation pour l'ensemble de la gamme. La conclusi...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2024-10-29, review by: Lesnumeriques.com

  • Abstract:  ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2024-12-01, Author: Евгений , review by: i2hard.ru

  • В среднем по всем играм в стоке Ultra 265K на 11% хуже предшественника по среднему FPS. Нет слов, одни эмоции, как говорится. Страшно представить, что вышло бы при равном XMP у Intel'ов. Ещё в преддверии разочаровывающего 14-го поколения уже были слухи о...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2024-10-24, Author: Nicola , review by: smartworld.it

  • Efficienza energetica migliorata,Temperature sotto controllo,Prestazioni produttività buone,Processo produttivo TSMC N3B
  • Prestazioni gaming non eccezionali,Prezzo alto al lancio
  • La rivoluzione di Intel (non) inizia da qui. Il nuovo Intel Core Ultra 7 265K è il primo passo verso la giusta direzione, soprattutto in termini di efficienza energetica e performance per watt. Manca, però, la vera potenza pura, soprattutto in gaming, e q...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(65%)
 
  Published: 2025-03-01, review by: brainbox.co.kr

  • Abstract:  최근 모든 사람들의 관심은 "그래픽카드"에 쏠려 있다. 그래픽카드가 가진 성능을 첫번째로 생각하더라고 문제는 수급 불안정으로 일반적인 사용자들의 입장에서는 크게 문제가 없는 수준이지만 하위 엔드 그래픽카드의 대한 수급 불안정은 당분간 이어질 것으로 보인다. 이와 더불어서 새롭게 컴퓨터 시스템을 구성하려고 생각하는 분들이라면 어떤 시스템을 구성해야할까? 지금 당장은 게임 원-툴인 프로세서를 구매하는 것도 좋긴 하겠지만 이 프로세서도 역시 가지고 있는 한계...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 1 of 2 « Previous   1 2   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×