in.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Lenses » Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L IS USM Mark 2



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L IS USM Mark 2

Testseek.com have collected 28 expert reviews of the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L IS USM Mark 2 and the average rating is 89%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L IS USM Mark 2.
 
(89%)
28 Reviews
Users
(96%)
889 Reviews
89 0 100 28

 

Reviews

page 1 of 3
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2018-07-27, Author: Matthew , review by: techradar.com

  • Stellar sharpness and contrast, Super-fast autofocus system, 3-mode, 5-stop stabilizer
  • As pricey as Tamron's f/2.8 lens, Optional tripod mount ring is expensive
  • A major upgrade of Canon's popular 70-200mm f/4 IS lens, the new Mark II remains relatively compact and lightweight, but packs a heavyweight punch in terms of performance. The speed and accuracy of its autofocus system, the effectiveness of its image stab...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2019-11-06, Author: Maciej , review by: lenstip.com

  • solid and sealed barrel, excellent image quality in frame centre, very good image quality on the edge of APSC sensor, good image quality on the edge of full frame, very good control of longitudinal chromatic aberration, low lateral chromatic aberration, s
  • slight spherical aberration, performance against bright light could have been a bit better, higher vignetting than that of direct rivals, The Canon EF 70–200 mm f/4L IS II USM is undoubtedly an excellent lens. The list of its good points is impressive and
  • If you don't like compromises and you are a fan of brand-name lenses the Canon EF 70-200 mm f/4L IS II USM might be a good choice; I don't doubt you'll enjoy using it...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-11-12, Author: Matthew , review by: digitalcameraworld.com

  • Fabulously sharp, Lightweight for a 70-200mm lens
  • Stabilization and AF doesn't outperform the equivalent Tamron lens
  • Relatively compact and lightweight, this new zoom is easy to live with and a stellar performer. Even so, autofocus, stabilisation and outright image quality are no better than from Tamron's similarly priced 70-200mm f/2.8 G2...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2018-11-05, review by: dpreview.com

  • Abstract:  Last updated: November 2, 2018Whether you've grown tired of what came with your DSLR, or want to start photographing different subjects, a new lens is probably in order. Whether you're looking to take close-ups, sports photos or interiors, we've got some...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-09-04, review by: thephoblographer.com

  • Bokeh, Autofocus, Autofocus speed, Weather sealing, Light weight, Priced right,
  • Nothing

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2018-09-03, review by: Kenrockwell.com

  • Abstract:  Specs Accessories USA VersionUnboxing Performance ComparedUser's Guide RecommendationsCanon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS II (72mm filters, 27.6 oz./782g, 3.3'/1m close focus, $1,297 ) bigger. I got mine at B&H. I'd also get it at Adorama, at Amazon or...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-08-01, review by: pcmag.com

  • Lightweight, compact build, Very sharp, even at f/4, Strong optical stabilization, 1:3,7 magnification, L-series quality, Optional tripod collar available
  • Not f/2,8, Some visible distortion, Dimmed corners
  • The Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II USM is a sharp zoom with very strong image stabilization. It's not an f/2.8 lens, but it's still an excellent performer...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2018-06-07, Author: Pascale , review by: Lesnumeriques.com

  • Légèreté, Piqué élevé, Bonne homogénéité, Stabilisation plus silencieuse que celle de la version 1, Traitement efficace des lentilles, Blocage du pare-soleil
  • Distorsion au téléobjectif, 200 mm en retrait, Pas de progrès de l'autofocus, Ouverture f/4 seulement
  • On pourrait regretter que Canon n'ait pas modernisé le design de son objectif ou bien amélioré de manière plus significative la rapidité de l'autofocus. Mais force est d'admettre que la version précédente était déjà de bonne qualité et qu'il n'était pas n...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2018-11-13, review by: camerastuffreview.com/nl/

  • Fantastische beeldkwaliteit, Degelijk gebouwd, Weerbestendig, Geschikt voor teleconverters, Goede beeldstabilisatie
  • Bokeh (natuurlijk) niet zo mooi als bij een f/2.8, Vertekening op langere brandpunten wat hoog, Gevoelig voor tegenlicht
  • Gebruik de Lensvergelijker of kijk in ons overzicht van geteste objectieven om dit objectief te vergelijken met andere objectieven.WYSIWYG score:Deze tabel geeft de prestatie weer van dit objectief als je de bestanden in de camera opslaat als jpg, waarbij...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(88%)
 
  Published: 2018-08-01, Author: Pieter , review by: eoszine.nl

  • De EF 70-200mm f/4L IS II is een prachtig stuk techniek met een ongekende prijs-prestatieverhouding. Overweeg je de aanschaf van een EF 70-200mm, laat je dan niet afschrikken door de f/4, want die heb je zelden echt nodig of je moet altijd binnen in het h...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 1 of 3 « Previous   1 2 3   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×