in.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Olympus FE-200



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Olympus FE-200

Testseek.com have collected 8 expert reviews of the Olympus FE-200 and the average rating is 52%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Olympus FE-200.
 
(52%)
8 Reviews
Users
(55%)
4 Reviews
52 0 100 8

 

Reviews

page 1 of 1
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2006-12-01, review by: expertreviews.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Budget cameras aimed at casual snappers tend not to have a lot of photographic controls, but its rare to find one as lacking in features as Olympuss FE-200. While it predictably lacks aperture and shutter speed settings, we were surprised to find ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(20%)
 
  Published: 2006-10-31, review by: CNET.co.uk

  • Decent lens; small body
  • Poor performance; no white balance controls; exposure problems
  • While the 6-megapixel FE-200 boasts the nicest lens in its series, this extremely slow shooter is a poor choice when compared to less expensive alternatives ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(54%)
 
  Published: 2007-01-15, review by: steves-digicams.com

  • Abstract:  Canon Elura 100 Mini DV Digital Camcorder 9 Reviews $330.00 - $417.00 Sony Handycam® DCR-SR100 Camcorder 3 Reviews $969.00 - $1,050.00 Sony Handycam® DCR-DVD405 DVD Camcorder 3 Reviews $609.00 - $750.00 See more products

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-12-19, review by: digitalcamerareview.com

  • While the wide angle, 5x optical zoom lens and 6 megapixel resolution is currently a kind of “sweet spot” in the current Point and Shoot market, the FE-200 doesn’t perform well enough to keep up with the competition. In addition, in my opinion, any p...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-10-19, Author: Will , review by: cnet.com

  • Decent lens; small body.
  • Poor performance; no white balance controls; exposure problems.
  • This extremely sluggish shooter is a poor choice when compared to less expensive alternatives.

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(54%)
 
  Published: 2006-10-23, review by: cnet.com.au

  • Decent lens, Small body
  • Poor performance, No white balance controls, Exposure problems
  • This extremely sluggish shooter is a poor choice when compared to less expensive alternatives. ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-04-25, review by: smartson.se

  • Abstract:  5x optisk zoom och vidvinkellins i en budgetkamera gör testarna intresserade. Tyvärr likställs dess snabbhet med den hos en snigel.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-02-09, review by: Akam.no

  • Vi blir alltid henrykte når noen lanserer et kamera med noe som kan kalles vidvinkel. Når du får noe tilsvarende 28mm, blir kameraet mye mer anvendelig til fotografering på trange steder som for eksempel innendørs. Det gir også bedre landskapsbilder. ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
    page 1 of 1  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×