in.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Leica V-Lux 1



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Leica V-Lux 1

Testseek.com have collected 9 expert reviews of the Leica V-Lux 1 and the average rating is 74%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Leica V-Lux 1.
 
(74%)
9 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
74 0 100 9

The editors liked

  • Fast
  • 12x optical
  • Image-stabilized zoom lens
  • RAW capture
  • Sensitivity to as high as ISO 1
  • 600.

The editors didn't like

  • Big camera body
  • Auto white balance is bad with tungsten lighting
  • Expensive.

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 1 of 1
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2007-01-22, review by: asia.cnet.com

  • Fast, 12x optical, image-stabilized zoom lens; RAW capture; sensitivity to as high as ISO 1,600.
  • Big camera body; auto white balance is bad with tungsten lighting; expensive.
  • Leicas version of Panasonics DMC-FZ50 has slightly better JPEG compression, slightly slower performance and a much higher price tag.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(74%)
 
  Published: 2006-12-13, review by: CNET.co.uk

  • Fast, 12x optical, image-stabilised zoom lens; raw capture; sensitivity to as high as ISO 1,600
  • Big camera body; auto white balance is bad with tungsten lighting; expensive
  • Leicas version of Panasonics DMC-FZ50 has slightly better JPEG compression, slightly slower performance and a much higher price tag ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(74%)
 
  Published: 2008-05-19, review by: buy-n-shoot.com

  • Abstract:  Let’s cut straight to the chase with the LeicaV-Lux 1: the quality of the workmanship and the sophisticated design of the camera are unquestionable. So too are the speed of the lens and its considerable 35-420mm focal range. But, at the end of the...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(70%)
 
  Published: 2006-12-02, Author: Philip , review by: cnet.com

  • Fast, 12x optical, image-stabilized zoom lens; raw capture; sensitivity to as high as ISO 1,600.
  • Big camera body; auto white balance is bad with tungsten lighting; expensive.
  • Leicas version of Panasonics DMC-FZ50 has slightly better JPEG compression, slightly slower performance, and a much higher price tag.

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(74%)
 
  Published: 2007-09-01, Author: Margaret , review by: photoreview.com.au

  • Abstract:  Essentially a Panasonic DMC-FZ50 in Leica livery, the V-Lux 1 has taken just over a year to reach us. In that time, Panasonic has added two new models to its FZ line-up so the V-Lux 1 looks dated in comparison. Fortunately, it still has some worthwhile...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(75%)
 
  Published: 2007-01-23, review by: cnet.com.au

  • Fast, 12x optical, image-stabilised zoom lens, RAW capture, Sensitivity to as high as ISO 1,600
  • Big camera body, Auto white balance is bad with tungsten lighting, Expensive
  • Leicas version of Panasonics DMC-FZ50 has slightly better JPEG compression, slightly slower performance and a much higher price tag. ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(74%)
 
  Published: 2007-06-12, review by: Cnet.de

  • schnelles, optisches 12-fach-Zoomobjektiv mit Bildstabilisierung, RAW-Aufnahmen, Empfindlichkeit bis ISO 1600 einstellbar
  • großes Kameragehäuse, automatischer Weißabgleich funktioniert nicht gut bei Kunstlicht, hoher Preis
  • Leicas Version von Panasonics DMC-FZ50 bringt eine etwas bessere JPEG-Komprimierung mit, dafür aber eine langsamere Performance und einen wesentlich höheren Preis....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(74%)
 
  Published: 2007-09-17, review by: smartson.se

  • Abstract:  Med lånat utseende och vissa funktioner från SLR-världen så lyckas Leica V-lux 1 med att vara både användarvänlig och ta bilder av bra kvalitet.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-09-28, review by: cw.no

  • Abstract:  Leica V-Lux 1 er et av de mest gedigne digitalkameraene i klassen under speilrefleks. Vi har prøvd det og kåret det til testvinner. Likevel er det ikke et klart førstevalg. Grunnen er rett og slett at kameraet er litt for bra. Så urettferdig er digital...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(83%)
    page 1 of 1  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×