in.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Canon PowerShot SD890 IS Digital ELPH / IXUS 970 IS



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Canon PowerShot SD890 IS Digital ELPH / IXUS 970 IS

Testseek.com have collected 43 expert reviews of the Canon PowerShot SD890 IS Digital ELPH / IXUS 970 IS and the average rating is 70%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Canon PowerShot SD890 IS Digital ELPH / IXUS 970 IS.
 
(70%)
43 Reviews
Users
(96%)
11 Reviews
70 0 100 43

The editors liked

  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 5x optical zoom lens
  • Face Detection
  • Good image quality
  • Good macro area and quality.
  • Optical image stabilization
  • Optical viewfinder
  • Decent photos.

The editors didn't like

  • Inaccurate optical viewfinder
  • Awkward Control Dial and On/Off button
  • Noise suppression softens the pictures
  • Expensive.
  • Poor shot-to-shot performance
  • Small LCD
  • Awkward design
  • No optical zoom in movie capture.

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 1 of 5
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2008-10-28, review by: techtree.com

  • Optical Image Stabilization, 5x optical zoom lens, Face Detection, Good image quality, Good macro area and quality.
  • Inaccurate optical viewfinder, Awkward Control Dial and On/Off button, Noise suppression softens the pictures, Expensive.
  • The Canon IXUS 970 IS is a good looking camera and comes packed with features that would appeal to the aam junta as well those who want to do a little more than point-and-shoot. It delivers above average results and works well in most conditions. But ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2008-05-16, Author: Lori , review by: asia.cnet.com

  • Optical image stabilization; optical viewfinder; decent photos.
  • Poor shot-to-shot performance; small LCD; awkward design; no optical zoom in movie capture.
  • A solid compact snapshooter, the Canon IXUS 970 IS nevertheless disappoints when compared with its predecessors and line mates.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(72%)
 
  Published: 2008-10-21, review by: digitalversus.com

  • Quality of images up until 800 ISO, 5x stabilized zoom, Optical viewfinder, though not too precise, Excellent macro mode
  • New design that’s not too comfortable, No exposure bar when shooting, No wide angle, No HD format in video

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2008-07-23, review by: digicambuyer.co.uk

  • Build, Easy to use, Image stabilisation
  • No RAW shooting, Soft lens periphery, Image noise over ISO 400

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2008-07-14, review by: techadvisor.co.uk

  • The Canon Digital Ixus 970 IS is pricey next to its rivals, and its performance doesn’t justify this. Neil Bennett, Digital Arts Lowest online price: ££292.30 ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2008-06-19, review by: digitalartsonline.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Canon’s Ixus line is renowned for its styling, but the Ixus 970 IS’s design is a triumph of style over substance. It looks great but its ergonomics are terrible, which is a shame as the technology inside the pretty shell allows you to capture some grea...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(50%)
 
  Published: 2008-05-01, review by: expertreviews.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Canons flagship Ixus camera isnt the style icon weve come to expect from the range. The 2½in screen is standard on cameras costing half as much, and the curved plastic front picked up scratches during our review. The five-way navigation pad doubl...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2008-05-01, review by: stuff.tv

  • Optical viewfinder. Good images. Great image stabiliser
  • Cheap, plasticky feel. High price. Small LCD
  • In too many ways, this IXUS isn’t good enough to justify its high price ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2008-04-22, review by: theregister.co.uk

  • The Ixus 970 performs well, but then so do many cameras at this price point. We’re not sure about the new design, and nor are we that thrilled with the features, even with a 5x optical zoom. On paper, the feature set looks pretty decent, but the lac...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(65%)
 
  Published: 2008-04-08, review by: pocket-lint.com

  • Build and design, image stabilisation, low ISO image quality
  • No "true" manual controls – even in manual, high ISO image noise, zoom lens does not provide a wide enough field of view.
  • Stylish and great build quality combine with a natty set of features to produce a stylish snapper capable of good results

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
    page 1 of 5 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×