Testseek.com have collected 79 expert reviews of the Intel Core i3 6100 3.7GHz Socket 1151 and the average rating is 83%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core i3 6100 3.7GHz Socket 1151.
December 2016
(83%)
79 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Fast single-core performance, Low power requirements, Skylake for under £100
Can't compete in multi-core benchmarks, A little slower in some games
Performance Analysis The best part of the i3-6100's specification is its single-core speed, so it's no surprise that this affordable chip excelled in benchmarks where pure pace is advantageous. It immediately punched above its weight in the Cinebench R15...
Published: 2015-10-25, Author: Richard , review by: eurogamer.net
There was some disappointment that we couldn't overclock the Core i3 6100 when we first received it for review, but regardless, even at stock speeds it proves to be a highly capable performer - particularly when paired with faster memory. The only problem...
Published: 2018-04-02, Author: Bình , review by: topnewreview.com
Abstract: Apart from the odd surprise such as the Haswell-based, multiplier-unlocked Pentium G3258, Intel's CPU offerings have been consistent in terms of overclocking abilities for a number of years. We usually get two K-series models per quad-core generation that...
Coming to the AMD – Intel shootout, the only reason why you would even consider the FX 6300 over the i3 6100 is if you have a budget restriction of $100. But then again, to get close to the i3 performance you need to overclock the FX-6300, which requires
Not exactly futureproof because of its lower multi-thread scores, Fixed clock speed means that your CPU always runs at its highest performance settings. This can eat from the processor's life, Could have done with slightly more L2 cache than 512KB, Should
Yes, the Core i3 6100 blows away its nearest competition with single core performance. It even matches the multi-threaded capabilities of the FX-6300, only falling short to the i5 6400. With a high clock speed and Intel's support for the latest technologi...
Was this review helpful?
(78%)
Published: 2016-08-08, Author: Ian , review by: anandtech.com
This review tested the Core i3-6320, the i3-6300 and the i3-6100. All three differ in their base frequency in a regular fashion, going from 3.9 GHz to 3.8 GHz and 3.7 GHz respectively. The Core i3-6100 also has another two adjustments: the integrated grap...
Published: 2016-06-16, Author: HP , review by: relaxedtech.com
Compatible With AM3+ Socket, Cheap Platform Price, Good Multi-Core Performance, Silent Stock Cooler
Weak Single-Core Performance, High Power Consumption
Both chips retail for around the same and both are aimed at budget users. With that being said, the FX-6350 is hard to beat and having an unlocked multiplier makes the FX-6350 a much better product than the i3-6100 CPU. Not only did the Wraith cool much b...
Published: 2016-05-27, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com
Abstract: Though there are still some hotly anticipated titles due in 2016, we might already have the game of the year on our hands. Overwatch has been on our radar for a while now but it recently blew up in a big way with an open beta that attracted over 9 million...
Abstract: Mainstream CPUs are the bestseller models, since they gather more processing power than the value ones and are not as expensive as the high-end models. Today, we will compare two new intermediate processors, the A10-7870K from AMD and the Core i3-6100 “Sk...
High clock speed compared to costlier Intel chips, Support for four threads via Hyper-Threading, Lowest-cost "Skylake" Core processor, Impressive performance, particularly on tasks that aren't fully threaded
Significantly more expensive than competing AMD four-core CPU, Not unlocked for overclocking, Integrated HD 530 graphics can't match similarly priced AMD alternatives
If you're building a budget-priced Intel PC for gaming or general-purpose use, this chip is a great starting point, and surprisingly speedy. But cash-strapped gamers may want to consider more-affordable AMD alternatives. Read More...
