in.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus

Testseek.com have collected 224 expert reviews of the AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus and the average rating is 67%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
 
(67%)
224 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
67 0 100 224

 

Reviews

page 5 of 23
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2011-11-16, review by: phoronix.com

  • Abstract:  While Turbo Core did not help the Unigine Tropics frame-rate, the CPU was left running much warmer. In addition, the overall system power consumption was up. In this brief look at Cool 'n' Quiet and Turbo Core 2.0 for AMD's latest-generation Bulldoze...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-11-15, review by: phoronix.com

  • Abstract:  GCC 4.6 and 4.7 had regressed with GraphicsMagick when setting the first-generation Bulldozer optimizations while the Open64 performance was not affected. However, when enabling the highest optimization level with bdver1, the regression was erased. ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-11-14, review by: Bit-Tech.net

  • While we don't want to give the impression that the i7-3930K is a slow CPU for consumer applications and games, it isn't significantly faster than the Core i7-2600K. This is a problem for Intel, as the i7-3930K is almost exactly double the price; LGA20...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-11-07, Author: Carl , review by: HardCOREware.net

  • Due to issues with customs/logistics (no fault of AMD's), we're a bit late with our Bulldozer review. I suppose that is fitting in this case, but luckily, this gives us the chance to take a bit more time with the review, testing the Bulldozer CPU under it...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-11-04, review by: insidehw.com

  • Abstract:  We’ve been presenting a lot of new AMD products lately. APUs are slowly descending into the mainstream, and the very philosophy of using the PC has changed together with user needs. Making a brute-force CPU isn’t all that hard to do, but the balance of...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-11-03, review by: hardocp.com

  • In every game we played so far between the AMD FX-8150 and Intel 2500K, not once did the AMD FX-8150 come out on top with a dual or triple-GPU configuration. Even when performance was "similar," the Intel CPU still held a certain percentage of performance...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-11-02, review by: phoronix.com

  • Abstract:  AMD's Open64 compiler had a setback in the Apache web-server performance compared to the rest. The MAFFT performance was not too interesting except for LLVM/Clang lagging behind the other compilers. AMD's Open64 compiler tends to noticeably increase ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-11-01, review by: madshrimps.be

  • Abstract:  New Benchmarks First up some newer benchmarks tested on the Asus Crosshair V (Bios 9911) for the AMD CPUs and for the 2600K on the ASUS P67 Dlx and finally the i7 990X on the Asus Rampage 3 Extreme. Common parts used where : Corsair Dominator PC12800C...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-31, review by: Theinquirer.net

  • Abstract:  During that period, new operating systems with improved thread schedulers will come along and there will be a chance to see how the next generation 'Piledriver' update of the Bulldozer fixes any initial issues. Bulldozer's architectural premise that ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-19, review by: silentpcreview.com

  • Based on the tests we've conducted, the only end-users who could benefit from the new AMD chip are PC professionals that deal with sophisticated audio and video encoding, rendering, virtualization, and/or heavy workstation/server loads which max out C...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 5 of 23 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 23   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×