in.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus

Testseek.com have collected 224 expert reviews of the AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus and the average rating is 67%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-8150 Black Edition 3.6GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
 
(67%)
224 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
67 0 100 224

 

Reviews

page 3 of 23
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, review by: expertreviews.co.uk

  • An overclockable eight-core processor, but its performance is disappointing ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, review by: techradar.com

  • Great overclocking, Serious multi-threading chops for less than £200
  • Only slightly faster at stock than 1100T, Struggles against 2500K, And is pricier
  • We can't help but feel disappointed with the lack of performance progress the FX-8150 represents. It's not a bad chip, but we wanted more...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, Author: Mike , review by: alphr.com

  • Unable to compete on speed and price, which means one thing - Intel still rules the roost...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(67%)
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, Author: Tarinder , review by: HEXUS.net

  • Modern design, elegant modular architecture, Attractive pricing, AM3socket is backwards compatible
  • Not as fast as Thuban (1100T) in lightload apps, Underload powerdraw not ideal, Arguably still behind Intel's SB as an allround chip

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2011-10-12, review by: eteknix.com

  • Abstract:  I used to be quite a big fan of AMD, when the good old Athlon Mobile processors hit the market. They seemed to offer the best bang for buck in terms of performance and overclockability and they quickly became a hit.After this, AMD continued to offer typic...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-11, review by: vortez.net

  • Innovative architecture design, Very overclockable, Power efficient using Cool 'n' Quiet, Improved Turbo modes
  • Weak single thread performance, Often outperformed by Phenom II, Only fast in ideal scenarios
  • It's clear now that AMD have taken a different approach to making an enthusiast CPU than ever before. AMD FX concentrates on delivering performance in highly threaded applications, games and content creation. Coupled with new and AMD-specific instruct...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2006-01-01, review by: hardwareheaven.com

  • Abstract:  We will be running each through a selection of real world tests to establish how they compare to the latest offerings from AMD, and finding out how well they overclock using the unlocked multiplier.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-01-01, review by: hardwareheaven.com

  • Abstract:  Around 8 years ago AMD were going through a great phase where their FX range of Athlon CPUs were offering consumers industry leading performance in many scenarios. For example in games such as Unreal...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-07-11, Author: hassan , review by: wccftech.com

  • You may wonder why it took us so long to review the FX-8150? We received the processor last month and had to cover the Haswell Core i7-4770K first along with Computex 2013 which had put alot of load on me. But here we finally have the Bulldozer review and...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2013-05-09, review by: techgage.com

  • Abstract:  Ok. You, the readers, were right. We screwed up. I'll be the first to admit that when we picked the components for our current cooler testing machine a few years back, we blew it.It's not that the gear is bad, per se, it just isn't best-suited for testing...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 3 of 23 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 23   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×