in.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Athlon 64 FX-53 2.4GHz Socket 939



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Athlon 64 FX-53 2.4GHz Socket 939

Testseek.com have collected 8 expert reviews of the AMD Athlon 64 FX-53 2.4GHz Socket 939 and the average rating is 84%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Athlon 64 FX-53 2.4GHz Socket 939.
 
(84%)
8 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
84 0 100 8

 

Reviews

page 1 of 1
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2004-06-01, review by: HEXUS.net

  • Our final evaluation includes a mixture of good and bad. Were happy that AMDs released its premier CPUs without the user having to use registered memory. Just this fact opens up top-end performance for the enthusiast with deep pockets. Stock perform...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2004-06-01, review by: hothardware.com

  • Abstract:  Since we last took a look at their Athlon 64 FX-53 back in March, AMD has remained relatively quiet. There was a low profile release of the mid-range Athlon 64 2800+ into the channel, but nothing really new has come from CPU lines at AMD for almost 3 mont...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2004-06-01, review by: sharkyextreme.com

  • Slightly Higher Performance Relative to Socket 940, DualChannel PC3200 DDR, No More Registered DDR
  • Expensive
  • Throughout the review and benchmarking process, one thought kept coming to the fore: Socket 939 is where the Athlon 64 belongs. The flexibility of standard DDR and the power of an integrated dual-channel memory controller make for a potent combination...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2004-06-01, review by: gamepyre.com

  • The future is bright for the AMD Athlon FX53 and Athlon 64 platforms. In the near future we will likely see motherboard manufacturers include PCI-Express in the 939 platform, making this the way to go if you want to go down the AMD route in CPUs. Of co...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(84%)
 
  Published: 2004-09-01, review by: tweaktown.com

  • When it comes to upgrades, I generally use the rule of 10. If a new product offers at least a 10% increase in performance, then it is worthy of being a replacement for the old components. The number 10 comes into play because as a general rule, you wil...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(95%)
 
  Published: 2004-03-22, review by: Zdnet.com.au

  • Abstract:  The FX-53 (Sledgehammer core) is 200MHz faster than its predecessor, the FX-51, pushing the clock speed envelope to 2.4GHz. The former also retains the 1MB of L2 (Level 2) cache to feed the number-crunching monster.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-06-06, Author: Max1024 , review by: overclockers.ru

  • В принципе, графики понятно обрисовали общую картину. Можно лишь отметить, что Opteron 64 250 степпинга E4 при прочих равных условиях немного вырывается вперед, а лучший результат у материнской платы на чипсете VIA K8T800. Надеюсь, процессоры AMD Athlo...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2004-06-18, review by: tek.no

  • Trolig markedes raskeste CPU, Støtter CoolnQuiet, Ikke lenger behov for REGminne
  • Uforholdsmessig dyr, PCIe for Socket 939 er enda ikke klart
  • Vi har i denne testen sett at overgangen fra Socket 940 til Socket 939 i praksis har svært lite å si for ytelsen til Athlon 64 FX. Det omtalte ytelsestapet som REG-minne har medført på Socket 940-plattformen er mindre enn mange kanskje har forestilt s...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 1 of 1  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×