in.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Phones » Mobile phones » Sony Ericsson Xperia Arc S



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Sony Ericsson Xperia Arc S

Testseek.com have collected 158 expert reviews of the Sony Ericsson Xperia Arc S and the average rating is 78%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Sony Ericsson Xperia Arc S.
Award: Most Awarded October 2011
October 2011
 
(78%)
158 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
78 0 100 158

The editors liked

  • Great sound quality
  • HDMI port
  • Good battery life
  • Sharp display
  • Lightweight.
  • Stunningly slim and a nice contoured design
  • A radical upgrade over its predecessor
  • Keys and buttons are well laid out
  • Faster performance
  • Can now shoot panoramic images
  • Pseudo 3D capture
  • Good battery performance
  • Improved software tweaks
  • Screenshot function.

The editors didn't like

  • Buggy ICS update
  • No front camera
  • Oddly placed power button
  • Uncomfortable shutter key
  • Poor viewing angles
  • Pricing on the high side for a single core Android phone
  • Interface and menus have their quirks
  • Battery life isn't as good as we'd expected
  • No front-facing camera
  • No qHD display
  • Text input still not as good as default Gingerbread keyboard.

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 4 of 16
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2011-12-22, Author: Robert , review by: talkandroid.com

  • Abstract:  Sony Ericsson recently made a push into the United States with some unlocked options. We reviewed the Xperia ray last month, and recently the Xperia arc S and Xperia active became available. All three phones are compatible with AT&T's 3G network. Priced a...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-12-19, Author: Joe , review by: androidauthority.com

  • All in all the HTC Sensation XE has a bigger advantage over the Sony Ericsson Xperia Arc S. Indeed the Xperia Arc S is more fashionable to look at, but the Sensation XE is sturdier and more durable. The two devices may have nearly similar screen sizes, ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-12-13, review by: cellphonequick.com

  • Thin, tall and narrow chassis makes it more comfortable to use than other bigscreen Androids, Camera with good lowlight capabilities and native Panorama options, Excellent loudspeaker,
  • Still no frontfacing camera, Minor upgrades compared to the Xperia arc
  • The slim phone means slim buttons. Finding the power button requires a small amount of mental focus, while the tiny camera shutter and volume rockers would benefit from being pumped up a little.PRO:Thin, tall and narrow chassis makes it more comfortab...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-11-06, Author: Mat , review by: engadget.com

  • Distinctive designHigh-quality still camera4.2-inch screen is a TFT wonder
  • New features are niche, bordering on gimmickyNot enough here to recommend itself above the original Arc
  • The Xperia Arc S is a minor technical upgrade to the original Arc. Although the hardware here is still sound, there are better phones available if you're willing to pay just a little more....

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-31, review by: androidcentral.com

  • Abstract:  The past 11 months have seen Sony Ericsson recover from the disappointments and frustrations of its early Android efforts, releasing a solid line-up of well-designed Gingerbread-based phones in a range of different form factors. SE’s market share might...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-10-20, review by: mobilechoiceuk.com

  • Reality Display holds up valiantly against Retina and Super AMOLED...
  • Not a massive step forward for the Arc series Look and Feel...
  • A fast, slick and stylish smartphone upgrade that might not move existing Arc fans but will delight newcomers with its fast processor and that remarkable display ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2011-10-11, review by: phonearena.com

  • Thin, tall and narrow chassis makes it more comfortable to use than other bigscreen Androids, Camera with good lowlight capabilities and native Panorama options, Excellent loudspeaker
  • Still no frontfacing camera, Minor upgrades compared to the Xperia arc
  • In our review of the Sony Ericsson Xperia arc we said the company has nailed it, but now with the Xperia arc S, we’d say we have a minor upgrade on our hands. The thin arched profile that makes you forget you are holding a gadget with a huge 4.2” scre...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2012-01-02, review by: gadgetguy.com.au

  • Camera is very fast; HDMI port can be useful;
  • Battery needs to be a lot better; No front-facing camera; Physical buttons require determined finger presses; Performance can lag;
  • The Arc S doesn't represent a significant upgrade from the Arc, so won't be a compelling buy for owners of the original. And while it lacks some of the speed, features and endurance of other smartphones it is a slick-looking smartphone with a good camera...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2011-12-23, Author: Jenneth , review by: delimiter.com.au

  • Most of our complaints with the Xperia Arc S are fairly petty. The big picture view is that it is a good phone, with a sleek and distinctive design (even if it is a fingerprint magnet), an above-average screen and camera, and some nice extras like a micr...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-11-29, Author: Ross , review by: goodgearguide.com.au

  • Distinctive, unique design, Excellent camera, Great screen
  • Tiny buttons, Disappointing build quality, Almost identical to original
  • The Sony Ericsson XPERIA Arc S is basically the XPERIA Arc with a faster processor, slightly upgraded software and an 'S' tagged onto the end of its name. It remains a good phone but its plagued by the same issues as its predecessor: that being disappoint...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
    page 4 of 16 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 16   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×