in.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Phones » Mobile phones » Samsung GT-S5830 Galaxy Ace



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Samsung GT-S5830 Galaxy Ace

Testseek.com have collected 158 expert reviews of the Samsung GT-S5830 Galaxy Ace and the average rating is 71%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samsung GT-S5830 Galaxy Ace.
 
(71%)
158 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
71 0 100 158

The editors liked

  • Great Design and Display! Android! Good Battery Life!
  • Multitasking
  • 5 megapixel camera
  • 3.5" screen
  • 800 MHz CPU
  • Interface is snappy
  • Good quality of external plastics used
  • Looks more expensive than it is
  • Touch screen is accurate
  • Good battery life
  • Sensors like accelerometer
  • Gyro
  • Proximity and compass are available on these phones
  • Music can be enjoyed via MP4/H.264/H.263 player as well as MP3/WAV/eAACplayer with these phones
  • Organizer
  • Document editor and image editor are also loaded on these Ga
  • Comfortable design and build quality
  • Slick user experience
  • Swype keyboard

The editors didn't like

  • Fps Video Recording Just MB RAM No official GingerBread Update Announced! Decent But Not So Loud Volume
  • Uninspiring design
  • No Flash support
  • Lacklustre media performance
  • Disappointing display quality
  • Touchwiz 3.0 is dull and drab with nothing unique to offer
  • UI is same as less expensive cousins
  • Display lacks an auto-brightness mode
  • No dedicated camera key
  • There is no shutter key for the camera
  • Lack of support for Adobe Flash in the web browser
  • Ambient light sensor is absent on these phones
  • No DivX/Xvid video support out of the box
  • Battery does not work sometimes properly as well as the camera zoom
  • Nothing Exceptional About Features
  • No Flash Support
  • Low Resolution Screen

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 4 of 16
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2011-06-23, Author: Ross , review by: techworld.com

  • The Galaxy Ace is a mid-range Android smartphone that offers a slick user experience, but it's overpriced compared to its rivals....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-05-28, review by: Theinquirer.net

  • Sleek design, rear camera
  • Old version of Android, no front facing camera, low resolution screen

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2011-05-03, review by: mobilesroom.com

  • So coming to the delicate part of providing an unbiased judgment, this phone is great for those who want to experience Androids in Samsung but for all who seeks video conferencing this cell is a total let down. Also with regard to smart messaging this ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2011-04-19, review by: mobilechoiceuk.com

  • Cool looks, great price, decent features
  • Processor shows it?s not on the same level as many other smartphones
  • This is a neat-looking handset which, if there was no iPhone 4 to compare it to, would be snazzily appealing. Of course, it doesnt compare to Apples handset but its much cheaper and it runs Android, which for many will be a bonus. Plus, its well-specc...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2011-03-24, review by: cellphonequick.com

  • Small and stylish, Powerful Android software, Swype keyboard,
  • Slow internet, Laggy and jerky response when swiping, Social media lacking, Low quality screen
  • Finally, for a mid-range Android, the Galaxy Ace really ups the game with its 3.5-inch screen. However, it fails in two main areas – video recording and Flash support. If it were for these alone, the Galaxy Ace would still be a pretty strong contender...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-03-15, review by: phonearena.com

  • iPhonelike looks, Above average camera for stills, Hotswappable microSD cards (up to 32GB)
  • Poor video recording, Below average calling quality, No Flash, No DivX/Xvid codec support out of the box
  • In our tests of its calling quality, though, it underwhelmed us with reverberating sounds on our end of the line. Our callers reported hearing rather unnatural digitized voices, which suggests a poor microphone performance.The Ace comes with a 1350mAh ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(65%)
 
  Published: 2011-03-13, review by: geeky-gadgets.com

  • The Samsung Galaxy Ace is designed to be a budget Android smartphone, and I must admit I was pleasantly surprised with it, as it has a range of features that you would expect in a more expensive Android device.It definitely feels a lot better quality t...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-02-24, review by: brighthub.com

  • Abstract:  If mobile phones were categorized in the same social hierarchy as humans, the Samsung Galaxy Ace S5830 would most definitely be in the upper middle class category.The phone has an average performance through most of its operation, but there are some t...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2011-02-14, Author: Todd , review by: mobileburn.com

  • Abstract:  Sponsored links, if any, appear in green. During Mobile World Congress we swung by Samsung's booth to get a closer look at the Galaxy Ace, an Android smartphone. The Ace runs Android 2.2 Froyo and has a 3.5-inch 480 x 320 pixel display. It's powered b...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-02-01, review by: mobilementalism.com

  • The Samsung Galaxy Ace is a great little Android phone that’s perfectly priced. It offers a terrific set of features for the money, looks great, and it’ll fit perfectly in your pocket. If you want the full Andriod experience with a phone that has feat...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 4 of 16 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 16   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×