in.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Phones » Mobile phones » Samsung GT-I9500 Galaxy S4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Samsung GT-I9500 Galaxy S4

Testseek.com have collected 1196 expert reviews of the Samsung GT-I9500 Galaxy S4 and the average rating is 85%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samsung GT-I9500 Galaxy S4.
Award: Editor’s Choice May 2013
May 2013
 
(85%)
1196 Reviews
Users
(89%)
515 Reviews
85 0 100 1196

The editors liked

  • Excellent display
  • Brilliant camera
  • Android 4.2.2
  • Removable Battery and microSD card slot
  • Battery performance on the S4 is among the best we've seen from smartphones this year
  • Though it's still not anywhere near as everlasting as the RAZR MAXX HD. It's important to note
  • Though
  • That our testing took place on T-Mobile's HSPA+ network
  • And no
  • Beautiful Display
  • Powerful Specs
  • Good Camera
  • Supports microSD card
  • Great battery life
  • Good display resolution
  • Good processing power
  • Slimmer and lighter
  • Good camera quality
  • 3G
  • 4G LTE connectivity
  • Calling support
  • Comparison
  • Rating
  • High end dual cameras
  • Good processing power and speed
  • LTE A enabled device
  • Superb screen
  • Versatile camera
  • Speedy performance
  • Software features
  • Impressive HD screen
  • Great performance
  • Good battery back up
  • Impressive camera
  • Dual shot camera
  • Excellent screen
  • Superb camera quality
  • Loads of camera features
  • Great sound quality
  • Supports multiple video formats out of the box
  • Good battery life.
  • Startling screen
  • Ultra fast processor
  • Awesome camera
  • Amazing Full HD display
  • Outstanding camera capabilities
  • Powerful CPU
  • Android Jelly Bean 4.2 OS
  • Extensive features set
  • Slew of connectivity options like – NFC
  • Bluetooth 4 and more
  • Excellent performance
  • Crisp and vivid display
  • Plethora of unique features
  • Good battery life
  • Camera works well in good light
  • Good
  • Brilliant HD screen
  • Decent battery backup
  • Good camera (except low-light shots)
  • Expectations were sky high when Samsung announced the Galaxy S4
  • Since the South Korean giant had to better its very own offering
  • The Galaxy S III
  • Which not only ruled the Android world
  • But also went on to become one of the best selling smartphones of
  • It is very quick
  • Gestures work well
  • 5inch screen is super

The editors didn't like

  • Deceptively light
  • Plastic materials
  • Overwhelming amount of software features  could be difficult to use for some users
  • Only 8.9 GB of user accessible memory
  • Big surprise to nobody
  • The software is not up to snuff. Let's ignore for a moment that all of the ""innovative"" banner ""features"" mentioned above are at best useless and at worst annoying. The rest of the UI ain't much better. For example
  • There's a "
  • The software is not up to snuff. Let's ignore for a moment that all of the "innovative" banner "features" mentioned above are at best useless and at worst annoying. The rest of the UI ain't much better. For example
  • There's a "feat
  • Only 8.9GB is user accessible out of 16GB
  • Less battery power
  • Comparison
  • The range of features could get confusing
  • Mixed success with some features such as Air Glance and Air callaccept
  • Unimpressive design
  • Poor low light camera shots
  • No FM
  • Uninspiring design
  • Flimsy back cover
  • Noticeable lag in certain basic tasks
  • Cluttered UI
  • Uncomfortable for singlehanded use
  • Expensive
  • Feels cheaper than similarpriced phones
  • 'Innovation' makes things too complex
  • Minor UI issues
  • Plasticky built does not exude HTC One like premium feel
  • TouchWiz a bit laggy at times
  • Features like Smart Scroll
  • Air View have occasional hiccups
  • Meager onboard memory out of 16GB storage only 8GB is available
  • Lacks that premium feel
  • Too many features can confuse
  • Old design
  • No FM radio
  • Call drop
  • Same old design that doesn't feel premium
  • Camera is not good at taking low-light shots
  • Major portion of internal storage taken up by Samsung apps (read bloat-ware)
  • Looks could have been better
  • Price is a little steep
  • Macro shots are not the best

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 87 of 120
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2013-04-25, Author: Dennis , review by: besteproduct.nl

  • Abstract:  Met de Galaxy S4 is Samsung niet zuinig geweest met het toevoegen van nieuwe functies aan de smartphone. Je kunt het zo gek niet bedenken of de S4 kan en doet het. Hij kijkt naar je ogen, hij is te bedienen zonder ‘m aan te raken en elke beweging herbergt...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-04-23, Author: Sander , review by: hardware.info

  • Uiterlijk is de Samsung Galaxy S4 een veel verfijnder apparaat geworden dan de S III van vorig jaar, die op sommige punten toch nog wat lomp oogde. Het grootste probleem vinden we het toch wel goedkoop ogende plastic dat voor het achterklepje is...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-04-23, Author: Sander , review by: hardware.info

  • Uiterlijk is de Samsung Galaxy S4 een veel verfijnder apparaat geworden dan de S III van vorig jaar, die op sommige punten toch nog wat lomp oogde. Het grootste probleem vinden we het toch wel goedkoop ogende plastic dat voor het achterklepje is...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-02-25, Author: Eric , review by: hardware.info

  • Abstract:  Hoewel het Mobile World Congress pas vandaag officieel van start is gegaan, hebben veel fabrikanten hun nieuwe 2013 high-end toestellen al voor de beurs aangekondigd. Zowel Sony, HTC als LG toonden hun nieuwe paradepaardjes de afgelopen weken al aan de ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-08-29, Author: Steen , review by: mobil.nu

  • Abstract:  Tech Daily har gennemført en stor batteritest baseret på taletid og webbrug. Modellerne, der blev testet, var Samsung Galaxy S4, HTC One, Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini, Apple iPhone 5S, Blackberry Z10, HTC One Mini, Apple iPhone 5C og Nokia Lumia 1020. Både Sa...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-10-18, review by: digitalfoto.dk

  • Abstract:  GEARGUIDEN Test af Samsung Galaxy S4S4 lægger sig i kølvandet på testvinderen S3 takket være en forrygende billedkvalitet, som udfordrer kompaktkameraet. Android-telefonen S4 er lidt større end sin forgænger og en smule slankere. Den har ét kamera på b...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-09-11, Author: Høy , review by: appsandroid.dk

  • Abstract:  Benchmark: LG G2 vs Samsung Galaxy S4 vs Sony Xperia Z Detaljer Publiceret: Onsdag, 11. september 2013 12:43 Skrevet af Høy Benchmarktests med Linpack, Quadrant, og Antutu på LG G2, SGS4, og Sony Xperia Z. Sony Xperia Z ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-09-11, Author: Høy , review by: appsandroid.dk

  • Abstract:  Samsung Galaxy S4 er ligeledes en topmodel, og den nyeste i samsungs Galaxy S-serie.LG G2 blev præsenteret i august hvor vi var med i New York, og den har en klar fordel frem for de to andre når vi snakker hastighed og præstation. Den er nemlig født med...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-08-13, review by: hwt.dk

  • UK summaryproduct Kongen er tilbage. 4 0 5 Forrige side ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2013-07-25, Author: Mikkel , review by: computerworld.dk

  • Abstract:  Hvilken Android-mobil er den bedste lige nu? Få svaret i denne stortest, hvor vi ser nærmere på de her fem supermodeller: Samsung Galaxy S4, HTC One, Sony Xperia Z, Google Nexus 4 og LG Optimus G....

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 87 of 120 « Previous   1 ... 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 ... 120   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×