in.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Phones » Mobile phones » Samsung GT-I9500 Galaxy S4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Samsung GT-I9500 Galaxy S4

Testseek.com have collected 1196 expert reviews of the Samsung GT-I9500 Galaxy S4 and the average rating is 85%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samsung GT-I9500 Galaxy S4.
Award: Editor’s Choice May 2013
May 2013
 
(85%)
1196 Reviews
Users
(89%)
515 Reviews
85 0 100 1196

The editors liked

  • Excellent display
  • Brilliant camera
  • Android 4.2.2
  • Removable Battery and microSD card slot
  • Battery performance on the S4 is among the best we've seen from smartphones this year
  • Though it's still not anywhere near as everlasting as the RAZR MAXX HD. It's important to note
  • Though
  • That our testing took place on T-Mobile's HSPA+ network
  • And no
  • Beautiful Display
  • Powerful Specs
  • Good Camera
  • Supports microSD card
  • Great battery life
  • Good display resolution
  • Good processing power
  • Slimmer and lighter
  • Good camera quality
  • 3G
  • 4G LTE connectivity
  • Calling support
  • Comparison
  • Rating
  • High end dual cameras
  • Good processing power and speed
  • LTE A enabled device
  • Superb screen
  • Versatile camera
  • Speedy performance
  • Software features
  • Impressive HD screen
  • Great performance
  • Good battery back up
  • Impressive camera
  • Dual shot camera
  • Excellent screen
  • Superb camera quality
  • Loads of camera features
  • Great sound quality
  • Supports multiple video formats out of the box
  • Good battery life.
  • Startling screen
  • Ultra fast processor
  • Awesome camera
  • Amazing Full HD display
  • Outstanding camera capabilities
  • Powerful CPU
  • Android Jelly Bean 4.2 OS
  • Extensive features set
  • Slew of connectivity options like – NFC
  • Bluetooth 4 and more
  • Excellent performance
  • Crisp and vivid display
  • Plethora of unique features
  • Good battery life
  • Camera works well in good light
  • Good
  • Brilliant HD screen
  • Decent battery backup
  • Good camera (except low-light shots)
  • Expectations were sky high when Samsung announced the Galaxy S4
  • Since the South Korean giant had to better its very own offering
  • The Galaxy S III
  • Which not only ruled the Android world
  • But also went on to become one of the best selling smartphones of
  • It is very quick
  • Gestures work well
  • 5inch screen is super

The editors didn't like

  • Deceptively light
  • Plastic materials
  • Overwhelming amount of software features  could be difficult to use for some users
  • Only 8.9 GB of user accessible memory
  • Big surprise to nobody
  • The software is not up to snuff. Let's ignore for a moment that all of the ""innovative"" banner ""features"" mentioned above are at best useless and at worst annoying. The rest of the UI ain't much better. For example
  • There's a "
  • The software is not up to snuff. Let's ignore for a moment that all of the "innovative" banner "features" mentioned above are at best useless and at worst annoying. The rest of the UI ain't much better. For example
  • There's a "feat
  • Only 8.9GB is user accessible out of 16GB
  • Less battery power
  • Comparison
  • The range of features could get confusing
  • Mixed success with some features such as Air Glance and Air callaccept
  • Unimpressive design
  • Poor low light camera shots
  • No FM
  • Uninspiring design
  • Flimsy back cover
  • Noticeable lag in certain basic tasks
  • Cluttered UI
  • Uncomfortable for singlehanded use
  • Expensive
  • Feels cheaper than similarpriced phones
  • 'Innovation' makes things too complex
  • Minor UI issues
  • Plasticky built does not exude HTC One like premium feel
  • TouchWiz a bit laggy at times
  • Features like Smart Scroll
  • Air View have occasional hiccups
  • Meager onboard memory out of 16GB storage only 8GB is available
  • Lacks that premium feel
  • Too many features can confuse
  • Old design
  • No FM radio
  • Call drop
  • Same old design that doesn't feel premium
  • Camera is not good at taking low-light shots
  • Major portion of internal storage taken up by Samsung apps (read bloat-ware)
  • Looks could have been better
  • Price is a little steep
  • Macro shots are not the best

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 39 of 120
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2013-05-02, Author: Ross , review by: pcworld.co.nz

  • Excellent battery life, Impressive screen, Outstanding camera
  • Too many gimmicks, UI can be overwhelming, Slippery, plastic build
  • The Samsung Galaxy S4 looks almost identical to its predecessor but includes a better display, an improved camera and a huge amount of software features and functions, many of which are gimmicks. This is an excellent and overall outstanding smartphone, bu...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(85%)
 
  Published: 2013-04-17, Author: Harley , review by: pcworld.co.nz

  • Abstract:  NameSmartphone: Samsung Galaxy S4At a glance:Polycarbonate plastic body,5-inch, 1080 x 1920-pixel screen,13MP rear-facing camera, 2MP front camera,Quad-core, 1.9GHz CPU,2GB RAM, 16/32/64GB storage,Runs Android 4.2.2 ‘Jelly Bean'Summary:Feels like a refine...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-05-14, Author: Hanleigh , review by: techsmart.co.za

  • Brilliant display, great performance from the octa-core CPU, runs on the latest edition of Android, IR blaster functionality is handy, excellent snapper with plethora of camera plus video features, and good battery
  • Plastic build doesn't match the premium feel of rivals like the HTC One and iPhone 5, low-light photo quality is no match for rivals such as the Nokia Lumia 920, capacitive buttons cannot be seen in direct sunlight on the white S4, and not much else

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-11-22, review by: technave.com

  • Abstract:  Recently, it came to light that Samsung and other mobile manufacturers were cheating current mobile benchmarks by upping processor performance each time these benchmarks were run on their devices. While this isn't something new in the tech industry, quite...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-07-05, Author: Reuben , review by: techattack.my

  • Improved design, durable and lightweight, Gorgeous display, Blazing fast processor, Excellent battery life; userremovable battery
  • Google
  • Samsung has delivered again with its flagship fourth generation Galaxy S smartphone and it is easily the best smartphone of the year, but it's not without its flaws. I have no issues with the design, in fact I actually like how durable and light it is com...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-07-05, Author: Reuben , review by: techattack.my

  • Improved design, durable and lightweight, Gorgeous display, Blazing fast processor, Excellent battery life; userremovable battery
  • Share this:
  • Samsung has delivered again with its flagship fourth generation Galaxy S smartphone and it is easily the best smartphone of the year, but it's not without its flaws. I have no issues with the design, in fact I actually like how durable and light it is com...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-07-01, Author: Pang , review by: lowyat.net

  • Abstract:  The runaway success that was the Samsung Galaxy S III, the Korean company's flagship Android smartphone of 2012, was one of the defining moments for the Korean giants. Naturally, the challenge for Samsung was to build a worthy successor for 2013. The ques...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-06-27, review by: technave.com

  • Abstract:  The new Samsung Galaxy S4 LTE-A packs in Qualcomm's latest Snapdragon 800 chipset which among others includes a 2.3Ghz Quad-core processor and Adreno 330 Graphics. There are two other earlier versions with the Samsung Galaxy S4 I9500 powered by Samsung's ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-06-18, Author: winniekepala , review by: winniekepala.com

  • Some handy features like “Air View” and bountiful “Camera” modes for great pictures every time, Maintains a good size that fits nicely in your hands, even with a 5″ screen, Cheaper than the HTC One (with very attractive telco plans / outright purchase)
  • Buggy phone with some features, functions and app not working the way its supposed to, Way too many features that tends to be buried and hard to find; also making it bloated and slows down the phone, Plastic!
  • I know a lot of you are considering between the Samsung Galaxy S4 or the HTC One as both are really impressive and high profile Android flagship smartphones. I get asked that a lot.Without sounding like a broken record and repeating myself on the points i...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-06-14, Author: calventchan , review by: nasilemaktech.com

  • Abstract:  Just as you bought your new Samsung Galaxy S4, you will just keep testing and playing with all the neat little functions it has. But the only thing that we don't dare to test is it's “reliability”. Should you are dare enough to throw your Galaxy S4 on the...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 39 of 120 « Previous   1 ... 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 ... 120   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×