in.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Phones » Mobile phones » Ampd Motorola Q



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Ampd Motorola Q

Testseek.com have collected 40 expert reviews of the Ampd Motorola Q and the average rating is 72%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Ampd Motorola Q.
 
(72%)
40 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
72 0 100 40

The editors liked

  • Sexy
  • Ultrathin design
  • Sharp display
  • A full QWERTY keyboard
  • EV-DO support
  • Sharp multimedia functionality
  • Solid call quality.

The editors didn't like

  • Lacks integrated Wi-Fi and analog roaming
  • Bluetooth cannot be used as a wireless modem
  • Screen tends to hold smudges
  • No option for a cameraless version.

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 2 of 4
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2007-04-29, review by: cnet.com

  • The Motorola Q boasts a sexy, ultrathin design and features a sharp display, a full QWERTY keyboard, and multimedia functionality. The Ampd Edition also includes access to the carriers TV and music services, and it features a revamped, hipper interfa...
  • Video playback on the Moto Q, Ampd Edition was a bit choppy, and it was sluggish when accessing and downloading multimedia content.
  • The Motorola Q, Ampd Edition brings a fresh look and content to the Windows Mobile smart phone that will appeal to the providers younger audience.

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2007-03-26, review by: phonedog.com

  • Abstract:  Motorola launched their Q smartphone amidst a flurry of hype proclaiming it the worlds thinnest, lightest, and most stylish handset to feature a full QWERTY keyboard. Still a hairs-breadth skinnier than the new Samsung Blackjack, the Q is amongst the...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(86%)
 
  Published: 2007-02-20, review by: slashphone.com

  • Abstract:  The MOTO Q has been out for a little while, however, Sprint customers have only more recently been able to get their hands on one. The folks over at Sprint were kind enough to send us over one that I’ve been testing out for a couple of weeks. First, l...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-02-20, review by: Cdrinfo.com

  • Great form factor, jog wheel is great for navigating, screen is Beautiful, Sound quality is top notch, EvDO makes web browsing very quick, feels so nice in your hands, pricing makes this a great Smartphone for the money, Competitive Data Plan at only $15...
  • Battery life was terrible, voice command recognition needs a little work, Plastic battery cover is very flimsy and easy to break, Most Sprint PowerVision services are not available on the Q.
  • The Q is no longer the sleekest, sexiest and coolest SmartPhone that it was when Verizon first launched it. The Blackjack is smaller and thinner and the BlackBerry Pearl is smaller, just as thin and way sexier. That being said, the fact that I could u...

Read the full review (Q) »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-02-15, review by: infosyncworld.com

  • Slim design in an attractive shell; better performance and tethered modem support thanks to the firmware upgrade; On Demand is a useful tool.
  • No Power Vision support; Internet Explorer cant handle some larger pages; Windows Mobile 6 upgrade still up in the air.
  • The firmware version on the Q we tested for this review is markedly improved over the previous version. In addition to improvements in performance, the tethered modem support is something we definitely missed in the older Q. Though the Sprint version...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(63%)
 
  Published: 2007-01-12, review by: mobilitytoday.com

  • Abstract:  This week at the 2007 Consumer Electronics Show Sprint announced the availability of the new Motorola Q. Lucky for us we were able to get our hands on a unit and quite honestly are very happy with it! Previously we were very unhappy with the poor batte...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-11-01, review by: geardiary.com

  • The solid feel, bright screen, jog-wheel, directional pad
  • Battery life is poor, keys are “plasticy” and too close together, no WiFi, uncomfortable in hand
  • Not long ago I was asked to review a few Motorola Q cases for Vaja; the only problem was that I didn’t actually have a Motorola Q! It was no problem to put in a request for a review unit and one was sent very quickly, but there was one potential...

Read the full review (Q) »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-10-24, review by: Pocketnow.com

  • Great form factor, Excellent display, Backlit QWERTY keyboard, Highspeed EVDO support
  • Battery life could be better, Mediocre voice recognition, Screen may be difficult to read for those with imperfect vision, Mysterious shut downs
  • I really enjoyed the extended time that I got to use the Motorola Q, and Id like to thank Verizon Wireless for that opportunity. Im normally a fan of clamshell phones, but the Qs form factor was usable and the functionality was good. What Id re...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2006-10-19, review by: Smartphonethoughts.com

  • Abstract:  Motorola Q: The Trendsetter By Jerry Raia and Kris Kumar on Thursday, October 19, 2006 Page 1 of 4 | Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4 Next | [Full article] Product Category: CDMA/EV-DO based Mobile PhoneManufacturer: MotorolaWhere to Buy: Verizon WirelessPrice...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-10-15, review by: Digitaltrends.com

  • Less than a half-inch thick Less expensive than competitors Bright 2.5-inch, 320 x 240 pixel screen Verizon EV-DO broadband network Windows Mobile 5.0 Smartphone Edition operating system E-mail with attachments Hotmail MSN Messenger compatible Digital ...
  • "Only" a 1.3 MP camera Slightly awkward keyboard for text input No docking cradle No included headset
  • In many ways, the Q is a missed opportunity. To really differentiate the Q from other Smartphones, Motorola ought to have included a higher resolution camera, a dedicated 3.5mm stereo headset (or at least included a 2.5mm stereo/inline mic ear set), an...

Read the full review (Q) »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(65%)
    page 2 of 4 « Previous   1 2 3 4   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×