Testseek.com have collected 121 expert reviews of the Fitbit Charge HR and the average rating is 79%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Fitbit Charge HR.
February 2015
(79%)
121 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
(84%)
181 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
790100121
The editors liked
It's just so damn simple to use
Nice and subtle looking
And the screen is generally easy to read
Battery life is very good (almost 6 days)
And step counting and heart rate monitoring were both highly accurate
The web-based interface is nice
Too
And
Heart rate monitor
Simple design with conventional watch buckle
Excellent App
Decent battery life
Heart-rate monitor
Great design
Fantastic app
The editors didn't like
The plastic display is easily scuffed which impacts its visibility and also just makes it look cheap. The small gaps around the screen that let grime in don't help either
Simple to use, Great-looking, Excellent battery life
Easily scuffed, Phone notifications could be better, Not waterproof
Yes. You should. If you want a standalone fitness tracker. This is a really, really good fitness tracker and it's reasonably priced for what it can do. Not only that, it's very accurate, it's super easy to use, and it's not bad looking. Fitbit really did...
Published: 2015-01-30, Author: Scott , review by: cnet.com.au
Continuous heart rate tracking. Slim design. Affordable price. Works with Windows, iPhone and Android phones. Fitbit's massive popularity means you'll be able to join up and compete with friends. Connects with many third-party fitness apps. Automatic slee
Design and fit aren't ideal for glancing at heart rate. Not shower or swim-friendly. OLED display turns off after a few seconds, which gets annoying. Heart-rate coaching and goal-setting isn't intuitive
Fitbit's Charge HR adds heart-rate tracking to an already solid fitness band at a great price, but all the kinks don't feel fully ironed out yet....
Was this review helpful?
(70%)
Published: 2015-08-19, Author: Daniel , review by: mobilesyrup.com
Abstract: It's August, which means that kids are filling their backpacks with pens, paper, textbooks and – oh, who are we kidding, no one uses those things anymore.Students want tech , and that's why our Back To School Guide features the best smartphones , tablets...
Published: 2016-01-18, Author: Sean , review by: futurefive.co.nz
this is a brilliant device, especially when combined with the App (and possibly the scales). For those that want to change their health habits then this is a great way to get your butt into gear...
So was it worth getting a Fitbit Charge HR? I found it useful when I was hospitalized, but that isn't a scenario anyone would aspire of. Spending 6,000 pesos for a gadget isn't easy, and we just used it up for 8 months which translate to 750 pesos a month...
While both fitness trackers can deliver good fitness tracking and motivation, each device has their own pros and cons depending on the need of each customer.VivoWatchWe recommend the Vivowatch for those who needs a smartwatch like function, the bigger scr...
Abstract: Fitbit's Charge 2 is the heir to the fitness gadget company's most popular fitness tracker, the Charge HR. The latter has been my personal favourite with its accurate step-tracking and heart rate monitoring abilities. But it is looking dated with new rele...
Abstract: The Fitbit Charge HR looks like a typical fitness tracker with a small rectangular Oled screen and only one side button.The tracking module is built into the wristband, so you cannot swap out the wristband. A stainless steel buckle makes the fitness track...
Abstract: The Fitbit Charge HR looks like a typical fitness tracker with a small rectangular Oled screen and only one side button. The tracking module is built into the wristband, so you cannot swap out the wristband. A stainless steel buckle makes the fitness tra...
Abstract: When I reviewed the Fitbit Charge earlier this year, I found it to be a no-frills fitness tracker which monitors your physical activities and sleep patterns quite accurately. But it would have been even more useful if it had a heart-rate monitoring featu...
