Testseek.com have collected 191 expert reviews of the Samsung SM-R175 Galaxy Buds Plus and the average rating is 82%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Samsung SM-R175 Galaxy Buds Plus.
February 2020
(82%)
191 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
(87%)
8358 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
820100191
The editors liked
Pros
Crisp
Balanced sound. Long battery life. Strong microphone
Comfortable design and fit
Good sound regardless of source device
Detailed
Rich sound with the Scalable Bluetooth codec
Excellent battery life on the earbuds
Wireless charging
Great for voice calls
Good app
Spotify integration
Great Sound
Stable Connection
Long Battery life
Awesome Added Features
Improved Voice Quality
Wireless Charging
The editors didn't like
Cons
Touch controls are too sensitive. Low water-resistance rating
Very long battery life, Good sound quality, Ambient Aware works well, Light and comfortable, Wireless charging case is convenient, Very strong connection and range,
Not great for phone calls, Touch controls aren't comfortable, No high water-resistance rating (only sweat-resistant)
Impressive 11-hour battery life, works wonderfully with Spotify, wireless charging support, decent audio performance, supports iOS,
Looks quite similar to the original Galaxy Buds, more robust water resistance would be welcome, no aptX codec, We say The Samsung Galaxy Buds+ is a significant upgrade over its predecessor, bringing almost double the battery life, enhanced call as well a
As far as endurance is concerned, the Galaxy Buds+ did not disappoint and ran just a few minutes short of the rated 12 hours of listening time before requiring a top-up from the charging case. With 22 hours of rated battery life, it has more than enough e...
Published: 2020-03-03, Author: Taylor , review by: androidpolice.com
Outstanding. Something like 11 hours of playback on a charge, Decidedly good. Not amazing, but improved over the original Galaxy Buds, Touches like wireless charging and in-ear detection are appreciated, $150 — a $20 markup from the standard Galaxy Buds —
Only IPX2 rated. Not safe for use in the rain (or by prolific sweaters), Galaxy Wear doesn't offer enough customization options
Impressive battery life, Much improved audio quality, Compatible with Android and iOS
No advanced codec support, No noise cancellation, Carrying case only has enough for one recharge
The Galaxy Buds+ have quickly become my favorite truly wireless headphones, and I knew it would take a lot to get me away from the Sony WF-1000XM3. Samsung offers stellar battery life, very comfortable earbuds, and some incredible audio. That's a recipe f...
Published: 2020-02-17, Author: Chris , review by: slashgear.com
Audio quality noticeably improved, In-call audio much better, Battery life is excellent, iOS app gives iPhone users more features
Still no active noise cancelation, IPX2 water-resistance rating is low, Touch controls can be finicky
The joys of going wireless continue to convert headphone users to earbuds like the Galaxy Buds+, and for excellent reason. Longer battery life, little in the way of sound quality compromise, and the general convenience of cutting the cord all help explain...
Bluetooth 5.0, Scalable Samsung codec and AAC, Battery life, Qi Wireless charging, Compact build, Mic quality
Lacks aptX, No autoresume playback, Limited multipoint
The Samsung Galaxy Buds Plus make important improvements over the original Galaxy Buds. You can now listen to recommended songs with a simple touch gesture, thanks to Spotify integration. While this feature is novel and one I greatly enjoyed, greater batt...
