in.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Games » PC » For Honor



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of For Honor

Testseek.com have collected 106 expert reviews of the For Honor and the average rating is 78%. Scroll down and see all reviews for For Honor.
Award: Recommended February 2017
February 2017
 
(78%)
106 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
78 0 100 106

The editors liked

  • Surprisingly deep
  • And satisfying combat
  • Moment-to-moment gameplay is a highlight
  • Deep Combat Mechanics
  • One Of The Best 1-Vs-1 Sword Combat
  • Looks Fantastic
  • Excellent Multiplayer

The editors didn't like

  • Multiplayer grind is off-putting
  • Steel can be used to get ahead of other players
  • Rating (out of 10)
  • 7
  • We played a review copy of For Honor on the PC. The game is available on PlayStation 4
  • Xbox One at Rs. 3
  • 499
  • And Steam for Windows PCs at Rs. 1
  • 799
  • Serious Online Issues
  • Steep Learning Curve
  • Can Put Off Newcomers

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 2 of 11
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2017-09-12, Author: Mark , review by: babeltechreviews.com

  • Unlike the RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooled edition which fell quite short of its performance target of the GTX 1080 Ti and barely matched the GTX 1080, the RX Vega 56 is faster than the GTX 1070 FE. Using performance as our primary metric, at $399, the RX Vega 5...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-08-21, Author: Mark , review by: babeltechreviews.com

  • Abstract:  Last Monday, AMD released its new Vega 64 processor in a vain attempt to beat the GTX 1080 and to take the performance crown from NVIDIA's GTX 1080 Ti. Since the reference version throttles performance due to inadequate cooling, BTR purchased a Gigabyte R...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-04-02, Author: Ripper71 , review by: gamingshogun.com

  • Abstract:  For Honor has easily been one of the most highly anticipated games of the year – partly due to its smoothly rendered gameplay and beautifully decorating battlegrounds/environments. Even more important, however, is that For Honor helps us settle one of the...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2017-03-22, Author: William , review by: hookedgamers.com

  • Combat is simple and intuitive. Lovely settings
  • Some of the accents don’t really fit the characters. Early server issues

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(84%)
 
  Published: 2017-03-10, Author: Dave , review by: wccftech.com

  • Good, weighty combat, A high skill ceiling, Has thrilling moments
  • Can feel cheap at times, Always online
  • For Honor has big production values and great combat, but a myriad of issues - server stability being chief among them - prevent it from being a classic...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2017-03-01, Author: Nathan , review by: Gamingnexus.com

  • Abstract:  When I was a kid, one of my favorite games on the NES was "Defender of the Crown", a fantastic game about warring factions trying to take over the land after the death of a king. It was almost like a videogame version of Risk but with a Middle Aged theme...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2017-02-25, Author: Hayden , review by: pcworld.com_techhive.com

  • Combat seems simple, but a competent opponent will annihilate you, Samurai vs. Vikings vs. Knights setup is so dumb it works
  • Multiplayer sandbagged by microtransactions and P2P woes, Repetitive and underwhelming campaign
  • Don't write For Honor off though. Sure, the singleplayer's not great, but I never expected it to be. And sure, the multiplayer has problems. Serious ones.But damn, when it's all working it's so good. This is a really frustrating review because there's abs...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2017-02-25, Author: Tim , review by: newgamenetwork.com

  • Even though For Honor's core combat is essentially an elaborate quick-time event sequence in disguise, the production values and novelty factor are high enough that there is still a good deal of fun to be had here...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2017-02-23, review by: proclockers.com

  • Combat system allows for depth and strategy, Each hero is unique and interesting, A lot of variety in gameplay among the different game modes and maps, Well done menu with transparency for how each setting will impact your system
  • Peer to peer connection introduces performance issues for players with bad internet connections, Sound design was a missed opportunity to set up a more epic campaign, The campaign feels rushed, solely existing to serve the multiplayer, In-game currency ca
  • This game is a bit of a tough sell, the primary focus is multiplayer. If the community dies there is no game left. Also despite Ubisoft promising not to split the community with DLC there are no details on pricing of individual items, as the game stands n...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-02-22, Author: Luke , review by: videogamesuncovered.com

  • For Honor is a game of patience, strategy and some luck, not for those who favour fast-paced combat but if you take the time to delve into the game, you won't regret the experience you'll get in return...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
    page 2 of 11 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 11   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×