in.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » Tablets/e-Readers » Foxit eSlick



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Foxit eSlick

Testseek.com have collected 10 expert reviews of the Foxit eSlick and the average rating is 56%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Foxit eSlick.
 
(56%)
10 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
56 0 100 10

 

Reviews

page 1 of 1
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2010-03-02, review by: computeractive.co.uk

  • Decent screen; long battery life,
  • Cheaplooking; zoom function can be annoying; controls a bit slow to respond with limited functionality; cannot work with paidfor ebooks
  • A good reader with some clever features, but flaws too...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(40%)
 
  Published: 2009-12-10, review by: alphr.com

  • A good reading experience is marred by a high price and unnecessary restrictions ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(33%)
 
  Published: 2009-11-04, review by: techadvisor.co.uk

  • The Foxit eSlick is slightly cheaper than a Kindle, but the savings don't cover the difference in quality. Jason Cross ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2010-05-24, review by: lanoc.org

  • So after making me a reader again (Ugh), I spent more than enough time with the eSlick. With this being my first experience with an e-Reader I was impressed with the idea of them and excited to see what we will see in the near future. Of course the eSl...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(60%)
 
  Published: 2009-12-21, review by: macworld.com

  • Abstract:  E-books have numerous benefits. Eliminating paper saves resources. E-book readers take up little room in travelers' backpacks and purses, and yet can store the equivalent of a whole bookshelf. You don't have to go anywhere to buy or borrow an e-book ti...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(50%)
 
  Published: 2009-11-03, Author: Jason , review by: techworld.com

  • The eSlick costs almost as much as the Kindle 2. Unfortunately, the eSlick's hardware has no wireless capability and suffers from ergonomic problems, and Foxit has a long way to go to provide software and services that would make the device a desirabl...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-10-30, review by: pcworld.com_techhive.com

  • Can handle free ebooks saved as PDF files, Inexpensive and easy to read text on,
  • No support for DRMencrypted ebooks, Only one font size on our model

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(72%)
 
  Published: 2009-07-01, review by: computershopper.com

  • Full zoom and reflow support for PDFs; thin and light without feeling cheap
  • Currently, native support only for PDF and TXT files; screen displays only four gray levels; no keyboard; stiff buttons
  • Foxits eSlick handles PDFs better than any other e-book reader, but its missing many features found on competing readers. Sonys and Amazons devices are better values. ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2009-03-10, review by: teltarif.de

  • Abstract:  Das US-amerikanischen Software-Unternehmen Foxit hat auf der CeBIT seinen neuen E-Book-Reader namens eSlick vorgestellt, der in Deutschland ab der zweiten Jahreshälfte 2009 erhältlich sein soll.Schon auf den ersten Blick erwies sich das 88 mal 118 mal ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-01-25, review by: clubic.com

  • Tableau récapitulatifModèlesAmazon KindleBookeen Cybook OpusFoxit eSlickSony Reader PRS-600CaractéristiquesTaille d'écran6 pouces (15,1 cm)5 pouces (12,6 cm)6 pouces (15,1 cm)6 pouces (15,1 cm)Résolution600 x 800 pixels600 x 8...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(58%)
    page 1 of 1  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×