Testseek.com have collected 188 expert reviews of the OCZ 2.5 inch Vertex 3 Series SATA600 and the average rating is 89%. Scroll down and see all reviews for OCZ 2.5 inch Vertex 3 Series SATA600.
April 2011
(89%)
188 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Extremely fast sequential speed, great real world performance, fairly priced,
Only shines in SATA III systems, pricy compared to other SSDs.
OCZ proves once again that it is a pioneering force in the SSD industry. The Vertex 3 is 50 per cent faster than the previous generation of drives, and sets the new standard against which all future products will be compared. ...
Abstract: Upgrading from a 2nd Gen drive like a Vertex 2e or Crucial C300 would be a tougher choice, which is only made harder by the need to have a solid Sata3 controller to gain maximum benefit.Personally as the Mid Range rig owner, this SSD isn't for me. Don't g...
the OCZ Vertex 3 definitely is a very good product. In fact it's by far the fastest "non-raided" SSD we've ever tested here. The new SandForce SF-2218 shows astonishing performance figures in the Vertex 3. Furthermore it absolu...
Abstract: With the Vertex 3, OCZ has a Solid State Drive in its portfolio which is based on the latest SandForce SF-2200 series SSD processor. The drive also features SATA-III support and OCZ claims that the drive can reach throughput rates of 500 MByte read speed ...
The performance on offer from OCZ's Vertex 3 is simply mind-boggling. In the space of a single generation, the speed of the Vertex SSD has jumped by over 90 per cent, leaving OCZ with a drive that runs circles around most of the competition. Sequential...
Although the drive we received from OCZ was an engineering sample it still featured their usual level of build quality. A robust casing was present and inside we get a PCB unique to OCZ with the latest SATA 6GB/s drive controller and quality Micron NAN...
Abstract: Price per gigabyte is, by far, the biggest factor preventing SSDs from replacing hard drives. If SSDs weren't so darn expensive, we wouln't have any trouble getting past their capacity limitations, because we would be using multiple SSDs in the same ma...
Published: 2013-01-06, Author: Andrew , review by: tomshardware.com
Abstract: The first mSATA-based SSDs we reviewed wowed us with diminutive dimensions, but not as much with performance. Today's best efforts are a lot more like their desktop equivalents, though. We round up 10 models between 64 and 256 GB and nail down a winner. ...
