in.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » Graphic cards » PCI-Express » AMD Radeon R9 280X 3GB GDDR5 PCle



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Radeon R9 280X 3GB GDDR5 PCle

Testseek.com have collected 198 expert reviews of the AMD Radeon R9 280X 3GB GDDR5 PCle and the average rating is 85%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Radeon R9 280X 3GB GDDR5 PCle.
Award: Editor’s Choice May 2015
May 2015
 
(85%)
198 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
85 0 100 198

 

Reviews

page 20 of 20
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2013-10-10, Author: 권경욱 , review by: bodnara.co.kr

  • Abstract:  엔비디아 (NVIDIA)는 하이엔드부터 퍼포먼스 라인업까지 지포스 600 시리즈를 지포스 700 시리즈로 대체해 올해 하반기와 2014년을 준비했고 지포스 GTX 760을 마지막으로 당분간 라인업 추가는 이루어지지 않을 것으로 알려졌다. AMD는 이보다 늦은 최근에서야 라데온 HD 7000 시리즈를 대체하는 라데온 R9/ R7 시리즈를 발표해 그래픽카드 라인업을 재편할 것으로 알려졌다.하지만 라인업을 더 이상 늘리지 않을 것이라고 밝힌 엔비디아는 AMD...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-10-08, Author: 김민태 , review by: brainbox.co.kr

  • Abstract:  새로운 이름, 새로운 목표를 향하여. AMD 라데온 R 시리즈 그래픽 프로세서의 양대산맥 AMD 라데온 시리즈가 또 한번 커다란 변화를 맞이하게 되었다. 기존의 모델명은 HD x000 라인업으로 명명하며 전체적인 시리즈로 구분했지만, 이번 네이밍 방식이 변경되면서 한 번 더 그래픽 카드의 능력을 구분하게 된 것이다. AMD 라데온 HD 7000 시리즈까지 유지해오던 명칭은 이번 기회에 200 시리즈로 바뀌었고, 고급형과 보급형 라인업을 구분지을 수 있도...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-10-13, Author: Nongkoo , review by: vmodtech.com

  • ก็มาถึงบทสรุปครับกับการทดสอบ AMD RADEON R9 280X Crossfire Performance Review ที่วันนี้จัดทั้งแบบเดิมๆและโอเวอร์คล๊อกกันแบบเต็มๆเทียบเคียงประสิทธิภาพกัน เราจะเห็นได้ว่าผลทดสอบที่ออกมานั้นแรงมากครับกับการทำงานของการ์ดสองใบจะมีบางโปรแกรมและบางเกมส์ที่ยังไม่ร...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2017-06-30, Author: thesea , review by: expreview.com

  • 因此在最后的结尾部分,首先我们要肯定是的是,R9 280X显卡在大多数项目的后发提升幅度是高于对手GTX 770的。但是对于负优化本身,我们又可以得出这样一个结论,如果把负优化的标准设定为显卡在经过驱动版本的改变之后出现性能下降的情况,从我们的测试中是没有发现可以支撑该理论的证据的,虽然不同的驱动中的性能有浮动(注意只是波动而不是下降),但总的趋势都是提高和优化,仅仅是提高的多与少而已。如果具体说明的话,双方都没有看到可以作为证据的负优化表现,GTX 770在性能的后期提升方面不及R9 280X亮眼,但是...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2017-06-30, Author: Axe斧娃 , review by: expreview.com

  • 因此在最后的结尾部分,首先我们要肯定是的是,R9 280X显卡在大多数项目的后发提升幅度是高于对手GTX 770的。但是对于负优化本身,我们又可以得出这样一个结论,如果把负优化的标准设定为显卡在经过驱动版本的改变之后出现性能下降的情况,从我们的测试中是没有发现可以支撑该理论的证据的,虽然不同的驱动中的性能有浮动(注意只是波动而不是下降),但总的趋势都是提高和优化,仅仅是提高的多与少而已。如果具体说明的话,双方都没有看到可以作为证据的负优化表现,GTX 770在性能的后期提升方面不及R9 280X亮眼,但是...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2019-07-04, Author: 洪詩詩 , review by: techbang.com

  • Abstract:  Titanfall肯定在那名單內。先前遊戲開放公開測試(已結束),俄國網站GameGPU選了30張主流顯卡,測試這款仍使用Source引擎的年度大作。測試結果讓人驚訝,老邁的Source引擎表現依然出色,而且UHD下比想像中還要吃資源...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2019-01-18, Author: Axiang , review by: techbang.com

  • Abstract:  要找2014年遊戲大作,Titanfall肯定在那名單內。先前遊戲開放公開測試(已結束),俄國網站GameGPU選了30張主流顯卡,測試這款仍使用Source引擎的年度大作。測試結果讓人驚訝,老邁的Source引擎表現依然出色,而且UHD下比想像中還要吃資源。談到測試之前,先來看看這款遊戲的引擎以及影像表現...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-02-17, Author: tandee , review by: techbang.com

  • Abstract:  要找2014年遊戲大作,Titanfall肯定在那名單內。先前遊戲開放公開測試(已結束),俄國網站GameGPU選了30張主流顯卡,測試這款仍使用Source引擎的年度大作。測試結果讓人驚訝,老邁的Source引擎表現依然出色,而且UHD下比想像中還要吃資源。談到測試之前,先來看看這款遊戲的引擎以及影像表現。Source引擎是由Valve所開發,最初亮相於2004年的Counter-Strike: Source與顫慄時空2,後續應用於傳送門(Portal)、傳送門2(Portal 2)、絕地要塞(Team...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 20 of 20 « Previous   1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×