Testseek.com have collected 220 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 3.4GHz Socket TR4 and the average rating is 88%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 3.4GHz Socket TR4.
August 2017
(88%)
220 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
(60%)
2 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
880100220
Reviews
page 4 of 22
Order by:
Score
Published: 2017-08-25, Author: Michael , review by: phoronix.com
As already shared on Twitter, it's possible to get around a 36 second Linux kernel build. If you want to compare your own Linux system's performance to some other early numbers of this 1950X setup, it's very easy once installing the Phoronix Test Suite to...
Published: 2017-08-18, Author: Jeff , review by: Techreport.com
Before we issue a verdict on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X and Threadripper 1950X, it's time once more to condense our results using our famous value scatter plots. We take the geometric mean of all of our real-world test results and plot that figure agai...
Published: 2017-08-10, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com
The Threadripper 1920X offers more performance, uses less power and runs cooler than the Core i97900X. It also supports ECC memory (Intel's X299 platform doesn't). Compared to the Ryzen 7 1800X, the 1920X touts quadchannel memory support and more PCIe lan
The $1,000 Threadripper 1950X is competitively priced but nonetheless comes at a hefty premium. Threadripper falls a tad behind when it comes to gaming
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and Threadripper 1920X are very impressive processors that did extremely well in content creation benchmarks that take advantage of having a 16-core, 32-thread processor in the system. The good news is a good number of app...
Abstract: AMD's 16-core, 32-thread Ryzen Threadripper 1950X ($999 on Amazon ) is an angry Godzilla stomping his way through downtown Tokyo. Those puny 8-core, 6-core, and 4-core CPUs? They're just tanks and army trucks to be punted across the city.Yes, it's that go...
Published: 2017-08-10, Author: Mark , review by: arstechnica.com
Better performance than the equivalent Intel chip for the price, Fully featured platform across all chips, While liquid cooling is a must, Theadripper is easier to tame than Skylake-X, Huge improvements in production tasks over mainstream CPUs, Competitiv
Overclocking remains limited, Needs a suitably robust cooling setup and power supply, Lags behind Intel in overall IPC performance
Published: 2017-08-10, Author: Ian , review by: anandtech.com
In this review we've covered several important topics surrounding CPUs with large numbers of cores: power, frequency, and the need to feed the beast. Running a CPU is like the inverse of a diet – you need to put all the data in to get any data out. The mo...
Abstract: It is highly likely that you already know what AMD's Threadripper actually is in terms of specifications given all the recent coverage. Here is a quick chart that will give you the basics that you need to know. While we are not reviewing the Threadripper...
Was this review helpful?
Award
-
Published: 2017-08-10, Author: Ryan , review by: pcper.com
Hopefully you've been paying attention these last many pages, as the launch of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper processor and X399 platform is not a simple read-the-last-page kind of release. From a technology and architecture stand point, what might at first a...
Was this review helpful?
-
Published: 2017-08-10, Author: Tom , review by: overclock3d.net
We've got one item of hardware which comes with an unhesitating recommendation and one that has a little bit of a caveat to it, although nothing that you probably couldn't have imagined yourself.Starting with the unhesitating one, the ASUS X399 ROG Zenith...
