Testseek.com have collected 30 expert reviews of the Nikon AF-S DX VR 18-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED Nikkor and the average rating is 68%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Nikon AF-S DX VR 18-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED Nikkor.
January 2015
(68%)
30 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Abstract: The Nikon SLR system is beloved by enthusiasts and serves as the workhorse for many professionals. And it's been around for decades, so there's no shortage of compatible lenses. When shopping for new glass today, you have access to hundreds of options fro...
The AF-s DX Nikkor 18-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR is an ideal lens for those times when you dont know what you will be photographing and you want to keep your camera bag light. That said, the lens is heavier than its 18-200mm little brother, so if weight is a...
Abstract: Where you buy your gear matters. You expect to get what you ordered and you want to pay a low price for it. The retailers I recommend below are the ones I trust for my purchases. Get your Nikon 18-300mm f/3.5-5.6G AF-S DX VR Lens now from:Please share thi...
Published: 2016-12-15, Author: Paul , review by: dxomark.com
Abstract: In part 2 of our review of the best lenses for the Nikon D3400, we're looking at the performance of zoom lenses. More versatile than a fixed focal length prime lens, zoom lenses are often preferred by entry-level DSLR shooters, thanks to the convenience o...
very useful focal lengths range, good resolution in the frame centre, moderate astigmatism, good correction of coma at longer focal lengths, moderate vignetting at longer focal lengths, silent and accurate autofocus, good stabilization
weak image quality on the edge of the frame at longer focal lengths, significant longitudinal chromatic aberration at the biggest focal length, huge lateral chromatic aberration, distinct vignetting at the wide angle, high barrel distortion at the wide an
Instead of a summary it would be enough to present a comparison between the Nikkor AF-S DX 18–300 mm f/3.5–5.6G ED VR and the Tamron 16–300 mm f/3.5–6.3 Di II VC PZD MACRO. The Nikkor is noticeably more expensive, physically heavier and bigger. It provide...
Published: 2014-04-11, Author: Kevin , review by: dxomark.com
Abstract: We've tested the new 24-Mpix Nikon D3300 with more than 140 Nikkor and third-party prime and zoom models to assess image quality. Read onto find out which of these lenses have the best image quality when paired with the new camera.Like rivals Nikon's cons...
Published: 2013-12-11, Author: Kevin , review by: dxomark.com
Abstract: We've now had the opportunity to assess the entry-level 24-Mpix Nikon D3200 with a wide range of lenses. We've analyzed a total of over 140 Nikkor and third-party prime and zoom models to assess image quality, and to discover which of those models perform...
Was this review helpful?
(24%)
Published: 2013-10-10, Author: Kevin , review by: dxomark.com
Abstract: This is the third part in the series of our lens recommendations for the Nikon D7100 where we've analyzed nearly 46 Nikon and third-party telephoto prime and zoom models to assess their optical quality. Read onto find out which of these lenses are the bes...
Superzoom lenses were never going to be as good in the optical department as primes or short-range professional zooms, and the Nikon AF-S Nikkor 18-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR certainly doesn't challenge that paradigm. Simply put, if you aspire to make rea...
