in.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Sony NEX-3



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Sony NEX-3

Testseek.com have collected 58 expert reviews of the Sony NEX-3 and the average rating is 83%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Sony NEX-3.
Award: Highest Rated June 2010
June 2010
 
(83%)
58 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
83 0 100 58

The editors liked

  • Good JPEG image quality even in dark conditions
  • Large LCD screen with easy icon-based UI
  • 720p HD video with stereo sound capture
  • Mechanical zoom and focusing rings
  • HDR and focus bracketing
  • Quick Focusing
  • Compact Design
  • Built-in Help
  • Acceptable Image Quality at High ISOs
  • Competitive price. Superb image quality
  • Low-light performance
  • And speed. Smallest compact interchangeable lens camera currently available. Support for HDMI-CEC and SDXC memory cards.

The editors didn't like

  • RAW image quality could have been better
  • No optical viewfinder
  • Slow shot-to-shot speed
  • Not really compact
  • Almost all controls inside menu and very little outside
  • Expensive
  • Poor Battery Life
  • LCD is a Fingerprint Magnet
  • High ISO Unavailable in iAuto Mode
  • Limited E-Mount lens selection. No EVF option currently available. No manual control over shutter speed and aperture while recording video.

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 3 of 6
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2010-05-15, review by: imaging-resource.com

  • Abstract:  14.20MegapixelsSony E-mount3.0 inchLCDSony Alpha NEX-3 Overview Reviewed by Dave Etchells, Shawn Barnett, Zig Weidelich, and Mike TomkinsReview Posted: 05/11/2010 As the fourth major manufacturer to enter the market for small, mirrorless digital camera...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-05-11, review by: dpreview.com

  • Abstract:  In a little under two years, interchangeable lens compact cameras have gone from an intriguing idea to an accepted and integral segment of the digital camera market. Micro Four-Thirds pioneers Panasonic might have kicked it off with the relatively co...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-05-10, review by: popphoto.com

  • Abstract:  Both models sport an impressive 3-inch TFT TruBlack LCD displays with 921,600 pixels and 100-percent Live View coverage. The screen can be angled approximatley 80-degrees upward and 45 degrees downward to allow for shooting at unique..

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-05-01, review by: digital-photography-school.com

  • Abstract:  A few days ago I could tell nobody about this newbie. I was under an NDA (Non Disclosure Agreement) from Sony. The Sony NEX-3 was a hot camera!So Sony gave me a review unit of the Sony NEX-3 three days, explaining that they were so fearful of leaks th...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2006-01-01, review by: dpreview.com

  • Abstract:  1. Introduction2. Specifications3. Body and Design4. Body and Design5. Samples gallery Sony NEX-F3 Hands-on Preview May 2012 | By Amadou Diallo Preview based on a production NEX-F3 with firmware 1.00 The NEX-F3 is the latest entry to Sony's mirrorless c...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-06-03, Author: Muhammad , review by: productfeedback.com.au

  • Abstract:  A camera which offers the same quality as an SLR but the size of a Zoom Compact this is a very interesting product indeed. Sony NEX-3 is a micro-four thirds camera that offers a great range of features for the price. Check out the full review video above.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-11-11, review by: pcauthority.com.au

  • Can Sony's svelte NEX-3 compete with its bigger brother and the camera elite? ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(83%)
 
  Published: 2010-07-01, Author: Margaret , review by: photoreview.com.au

  • Abstract:  The main difference between Sony's NEX-3 and the more expensive NEX-5 model we reviewed in June lies in the video recording system. Whereas the NEX-5 uses the AVCHD format and can record Dolby Digital soundtracks, the NEX-3 uses the less efficient MP4 ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(85%)
 
  Published: 2010-07-01, review by: hereshow.ca

  • Aside from the tedious operating sequence with advanced features, there are only a few drawbacks to the NEX system. The flash unit is a bit weak (with a guide number of 7 in metres) and there's no built-in eye-level viewfinder. An optional optical view...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-10-05, review by: techsmart.co.za

  • We really liked the Sony Alpha NEX-3, more so than its competition from the Micro Four Thirds stable, the Olympus PEN E-PL1. The NEX-3 is small but felt good in hand, captured good quality pictures (although its lens gets criticised) and was a breeze ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 3 of 6 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×