in.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Panasonic Lumix DMC-L10



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Panasonic Lumix DMC-L10

Testseek.com have collected 53 expert reviews of the Panasonic Lumix DMC-L10 and the average rating is 74%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Panasonic Lumix DMC-L10.
Award: Recommended January 2008
January 2008
 
(74%)
53 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
74 0 100 53

The editors liked

  • The L10 has a nice body design
  • And its articulated LCD makes live-view shooting much more useful.

The editors didn't like

  • The L10 has trouble focusing in very low light
  • Tops out at ISO 1
  • 600
  • And its live mode has limited functionality when using most lenses.

 

Reviews

page 4 of 6
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2007-08-30, review by: dpreview.com

  • Excellent resolution and per pixel definition, but really need to shoot raw to get the best results, Subtle, restrained color and contrast (though see below), Better highlight dynamic range than Olympus equivalent (still a little tight in the highlights)...
  • Small and dark viewfinder view (difficult to see fine detail, difficult to check focus), New kit lens slow (F3.8-5.6) considering its size, In-camera JPEG processing produces images that are soft and dont show true potential of sensor, Many will find defa...
  • Panasonics second digital SLR is a far more conventional affair than its first attempt, the DSC-L1. Its also quite obviously aimed at a very different type of user - the beginner / first time user / upgrader from a compact. To this end the L10 has p...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(65%)
 
  Published: 2009-02-12, review by: pcauthority.com.au

  • A capable enough performer, but it doesn’t offer enough for the money to come out on top. ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(67%)
 
  Published: 2008-01-16, review by: dpexpert.com.au

  • Focus is quick and accurate and, as seems to be the case with the Four Thirds system, there is slightly greater depth of field at any given focal length. Resolution of lens and sensor is good. Colour rendition is very good, particularly of solid primar...
  • Dynamic range is poor and image noise at ISO settings above 800 is seriously intrusive. We noticed that Olympus seem to do better in controlling noise from the same sensor. We have a reservation about the price. A comparable Olympus E-510 costs $1500.
  • The physics of the Four Thirds system involves matching lenses to sensor in an arrangement that is ideal for digital cameras. The claim is that digital SLRs that are adaptations of film cameras involve unacceptable compromises, because light needs to s...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2007-11-27, review by: cnet.com.au

  • Nice body design, Articulated LCD makes live-view shooting much more useful
  • Ttrouble focusing in very low light, Tops out at ISO 1,600, Live mode has limited functionality when using most lenses
  • A nice body design and good image quality make the DMC-L10 an enticing entry-level SLR, but a pricey kit lens makes this kit too expensive. ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(71%)
 
  Published: 2007-11-01, Author: Margaret , review by: photoreview.com.au

  • Abstract:  Panasonics second DSLR camera, the 10.0-megapixel Lumix DMC-L10 is far more conventional-looking than its predecessor. Its also lighter and provides some of the features that have made the Lumix name popular with digicam buyers, such as an LCD monito...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(85%)
 
  Published: 2008-01-01, review by: letsgodigital.org/es/

  • Abstract:  La primera cámara réflex digital de Panasonic era una buena cámara. Construcción sólida, Live View, buena óptica y buena calidad. Mi primera reacción fue: es bueno que Panasonic se una al grupo de fabricantes de réflex digitales. And once the news was...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2008-03-10, review by: magnus.de

  • Abstract:  Die Gemeinsamkei­ten setzen sich beim 10-Megapixel-Bildsensor im Four-Thirds-Format fort, enden aber dort, wo die Panasonic eigene Akzente setzt – etwa mit einem Setobjektiv der Marke Leica. Das D Vario-Elmar 3,8–5,6/ 14–50 mm entspricht an der Lumix e...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-02-04, review by: computerbild.de

  • Abstract:  2006 brachte Panasonic seine erste digitale Spiegelreflex-Kamera auf den Markt. Jetzt wurde die Produktlinie ergänzt. Kann die neue „Panasonic Lumix DMC-L10“ mit den aktuellen Kameras der traditionellen Kamerahersteller mithalten? Das zeigt d...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-01-14, review by: letsgodigital.orgde

  • Abstract:  Die erste digitale Spiegelreflexkamera von Panasonic war schon sehr ansprechend. Solide konstruiert, mit Live View, einer schönen Optik und einer guten Qualität. Nett, dass Panasonic auch DSLR-Kameras macht, habe ich mir manchmal gedacht. Als bekannt...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2007-12-07, review by: Chip.de

  • Abstract:  Die L10 ist technisch mit den aktuellen Olympus-DSLRs E-410 und E-510 verwandt und mit dem gleichen 10-Megapixel-NMOS-Sensor (FourThird-Format) und Staubentfernungs-System ausgestattet. Wie diese Kameras bietet auch die L10 einen Live-View-Modus, mit d...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 4 of 6 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×