in.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Fujifilm FinePix X100S



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Fujifilm FinePix X100S

Testseek.com have collected 107 expert reviews of the Fujifilm FinePix X100S and the average rating is 86%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Fujifilm FinePix X100S.
Award: Most Awarded June 2013
June 2013
 
(86%)
107 Reviews
Users
(90%)
37 Reviews
86 0 100 107

The editors liked

  • Speedy startup and AF times
  • Excellent image quality even at high ISO
  • Q button for quick access to all important features

The editors didn't like

  • Slightly pricey
  • Lens cap is easy to lose
  • Fixed focal length lens might not be for everyone

 

Reviews

page 2 of 11
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2013-04-09, review by: pocket-lint.com

  • Retro design, hybrid viewfinder with wider-than-100% optical viewfinder and electronic overlay/full-time EVF options, improvements to autofocus compared to original X100, solid build quality, decent image quality, digital split image and peaking make for
  • At over a grand its undeniably expensive (X-E1 with a lens is less), no true ISO 100 sensitivity, exposure compensation dial still knocks out of place fairly easily, small LCD screen given chunky overall design, autofocus can be inaccurate/fail to focus,
  • When it comes to buying a specialist camera there's a lot to dissect and chew on. As we alluded to in our opening words of this review, the X100S isn't going to be suitable for a huge audience - but that, in some regard, is part of what makes this h...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2013-04-09, Author: TJ , review by: reviewed.com

  • Like most first attempts, the Fujifilm X100 showed plenty of promise, but ultimately fell short in a few key areas. After two years in the lab, Fuji has returned with the X100S, resolving many of the key complaints users had about the X100. Through that p...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(81%)
 
  Published: 2013-04-06, Author: Tony , review by: amateurphotographer.co.uk

  • Fujis strategy for the X100S was to keep the good features of the X100, make changes according to customer requests and to evolve the technologies. On this basis, the X100S is a firm success. The elegant looks of its X100 predecessor remain. Several hand...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2013-01-14, Author: Andrew , review by: trustedreviews.com

  • Fujifilm has approached the X100S in the right way. It hasn't changed anything that couldn't do with a tweak or two, simply sliding-in the improvements made in the cameras released since the introduction of the X100 in 2011. It's seems an excellent camera...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-01-07, Author: Angela , review by: techradar.com

  • Detail, rich images, Bright lens, Retro, style controls, Solid build
  • Filters are JPEG only, Bulky, Limited continuous AF
  • By taking some of the best elements of the Fuji X-Pro1 , such as the sensor design and Quick Menu, Fuji has produced a worthy update to the X100 , and many owners of this camera will feel sorely tempted by the X100S. The improved handling and image quali...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2013-01-01, Author: Gavin , review by: T3.com

  • Retro styling, Unique viewfinder, Lots of manual controls
  • Very expensive, Small LCD screen, No dedicated video button

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2014-03-12, review by: Kenrockwell.com

  • Abstract:  If the Canon 5D Mark III is the world's best DSLR and the Fuji X100S is the world's best digital camera, which is best?Easy: they are each best for different things. They are each completely different kinds of cameras, just as girls are completely differe...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-03-11, review by: Kenrockwell.com

  • Abstract:  Let's compare a , and , each with a 35mm f/2 lens. Let's see how well the real-world combinations of lenses and cameras compare. No one ever dares do comparisons aga......

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-01-31, Author: Roger , review by: imaging-resource.com

  • Attractive, retro rangefinderstyle design, Improved (excellent) still image quality that's even better thanks to second generation XTrans sensor technology, Great, sharp f/2 35mmequivalent lens, Overall better operation and performance than the X100, Addi
  • Lowlight AF slow and inconsistent, Video quality, even at 60p, compromised by moire and lack of image stabilization, Combined fourway pad/Command dial means AF control points cumbersome to change, Too easy to bump control dials and change settings acciden
  • The Fuji X100S rangefinder-style camera takes a leap forward with its new 16.3-megapixel X-Trans CMOS II sensor that helps it deliver stellar images with low noise, high dynamic range, good color and improved resolution. Overall, its performance bests th...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
 
  Published: 2013-12-01, review by: luminous-landscape.com

  • Abstract:  I don’t purchase cameras very often, but when I do I have good reasons why. At the most I ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 2 of 11 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 11   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×