Testseek.com have collected 64 expert reviews of the OCZ 2.5 inch Agility 4 Series SATA600 and the average rating is 82%. Scroll down and see all reviews for OCZ 2.5 inch Agility 4 Series SATA600.
(82%)
64 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
-
0 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
82010064
Reviews
page 2 of 7
Order by:
Score
Published: 2013-01-06, Author: Andrew , review by: tomshardware.com
Abstract: The first mSATA-based SSDs we reviewed wowed us with diminutive dimensions, but not as much with performance. Today's best efforts are a lot more like their desktop equivalents, though. We round up 10 models between 64 and 256 GB and nail down a winner. ...
With the Agility 4 series, OCZ has introduced new features which offer an overall boost to performance, for instance the Ndurance 2.0 NAND flash management suite designed to increase the life of your SSD along with correction capabilities up to 128-bits p...
Good overall performance, Good pricetoperformance ratio, SATA III compatible, mSATA capable for onboard running, TRIM command included
No 3.5″ adapter tray included, Performance can differ considerably depending on workload
The OCZ Agility 4 is a good overall drive, and can be a great value for those just making the jump to SSD-based systems. For this, it earns the Bjorn3D Silver Bear Award....
Alright, so concluding thoughts. Performance wise, don't expect much out of the Agility 4. The Agility 3 wasn't exactly the top performing SSD, but the Agility 3 did have the advantage of a SandForce controller, which helped boost performance when working...
Abstract: We are usually not very thrilled about reviewing SSDs with 120 or 128 gigabytes storage capacity. This capacity is just not good for showing what a particular SSD design can do. Today’s SSDs use eight-channel controllers and 64-gigabit flash memory chi...
Was this review helpful?
-
Published: 2012-09-19, Author: Patrick , review by: servethehome.com
At the end of the day, the OCZ Agility 4 128GB SSD is a decent drive. It sure is much slower than we have seen from the Vertex 4 thus far and is really only a bit better than what we saw from SATA II drives. With that being said, I purchased three OCZ Agi...
Poor performance compared to other SATA 6GB/s drives, Single request speed is very low, No drive adapter or mounting hardware included
When a product gets released it is never perfect, even though it goes through many different types of tests and procedures there are always things that can be improved or simply looked over. This is why you see software or firmware updates for many pr...
To date, we have only seen asynchronous NAND in SandForce SSDs and now I can see why. SandForce gets away with asynchronous NAND because it does real-time compression, meaning that it writes less to the NAND and hence there is also less to read. That's wh...
Published: 2012-08-28, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com
Abstract: It's been a great year for prospective SSD shoppers as prices are finally becoming more practical for system builders and consumers alike. Scrolling through our reviews from last year, most of the higher capacity models were prohibitively expensive for
Silky smooth operation as a system drive, Excellent sequential writing performance, Outstanding 4K random writing performance at low and high queue depths, Very good 4K random reading performance at high queue depths, SATA 6Gbps support, TRIM support
Sequential reading performance at low queue depths, could be better.
Let us summarise the most important positive and negative points belowPositiveSilky smooth operation as a system drive.Excellent sequential writing performance.Outstanding 4K random writing performance at low and high queue depths.Very good 4K random read...
