in.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » Harddrives » SATA » Seagate 3.5 inch IronWolf SATA600 ST-VNA / ST-VN Series



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Seagate 3.5 inch IronWolf SATA600 ST-VNA / ST-VN Series

Testseek.com have collected 192 expert reviews of the Seagate 3.5 inch IronWolf SATA600 ST-VNA / ST-VN Series and the average rating is 88%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Seagate 3.5 inch IronWolf SATA600 ST-VNA / ST-VN Series.
Award: Editor’s Choice January 2018
January 2018
 
(88%)
192 Reviews
Users
(89%)
620 Reviews
88 0 100 192

 

Reviews

page 5 of 20
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2016-09-28, review by: tweaktown.com

  • The IronWolf in its 10TB configuration brings a solid jump in capacity over previous 8TB NAS solutions. For those running multiple bay configurations, this means an extra 4TB for two bay users and 8TB for four bay users. A high-level of build quality is...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2016-08-31, Author: Ben , review by: pcauthority.com.au

  • "It's nice to have a capacity as large as this in a hard drive offering such impressive NAS performance."...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(83%)
 
  Published: 2016-08-31, Author: Ben , review by: pcpowerplay.com.au

  • Decent pricing and very decent performance for all your billions of files.

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2016-05-27, Author: Nick , review by: goodgearguide.com.au

  • Low cost per GB, Huge capacity, Standard 3.5-inch drive, Good warranty, Good NAS optimisations
  • High retail price, Not ideal as boot device
  • SSDs can't compete with price-per-GB-value of this magnitude. A great storage choice...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(100%)
 
  Published: 2018-01-26, Author: Jonathan , review by: aphnetworks.com

  • Compared to theSeagate IronWolf Pro ST12000NE0007 12TB, the IronWolf ST12000VN0007 12TB we are reviewing today gives up a few things: Three-year warranty rather than five, no included recovery services, 180TB/year workload limit rating rather than 300TB/y...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2016-12-02, Author: Jonathan , review by: aphnetworks.com

  • 10TB of storage capacity is indeed epic. As we move into a new generation of ultra-large hard drives that takes capacity up another magnitude, I think the Seagate IronWolf ST10000VN0004 is a winner in more than one way. You might think spinning those seve...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2016-06-17, Author: Jonathan , review by: aphnetworks.com

  • For about $370 at press time, the Seagate NAS HDD ST8000VN0002 8TB has a lot of similarities with its enterprise grade cousin, theST8000NM0055 8TB. At the same time, there is quite a bit that separates one from the other. Both hard drives are some of the...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-03-06, Author: Jon , review by: pcworld.co.nz

  • Abstract:  There's something about 12TB hard drives reading and writing at 250MBps that we just can't get enough of. This go-round, we review Seagate's IronWolf--the slightly slower, slightly lower-rent cousin to the mighty 12GB Seagate BarraCuda Pro we recently too...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-05-27, Author: Nick , review by: pcworld.co.nz

  • Low cost per GB, Huge capacity, Standard 3.5-inch drive, Good warranty, Good NAS optimisations
  • High retail price, Not ideal as boot device

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2018-04-12, review by: hardwarezone.com.ph

  • Faster performance than lower capacity HDDs, More affordable price-per-capacity compared to lower capacity HDDs
  • Still quite expensive
  • 9/10Write a ReviewCompare This | SpecificationsThe GoodFaster performance than lower capacity HDDsMore affordable price-per-capacity compared to lower capacity HDDsThe BadStill quite expensiveHave feedback on the article for the editorial team? You can re...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
    page 5 of 20 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 20   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×