Testseek.com have collected 214 expert reviews of the Intel Core i9 10900K 3.7GHz Socket 1200 and the average rating is 81%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core i9 10900K 3.7GHz Socket 1200.
May 2020
(81%)
214 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
(89%)
1520 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
810100214
Reviews
page 5 of 22
Order by:
Score
Published: 2020-08-13, Author: James , review by: impulsegamer.com
Abstract: It should also be noted that the Intel Core i9-10900K processor supports a turbo speed of 5.3Ghz with their Thermal Velocity Technology and is compatible with DDR4-2666, whereas the i5-10600K supports DDR4-2666 with both revolving around the 14nm architec...
If you were expecting Intel's 10th-gen to hammer Ryzen 3000 CPUs, you were wrong. Intel's creaky 14nm fabrication process can't fully stand up against AMD's (and TSMC's) 7nm, and Intel was never going to offer more multi-core performance than AMD's chips...
Abstract: Intel's new 10th generation desktop CPUs are here. Codenamed Comet Lake is the latest offering replacing the 9000 series comet lake refresh of CPUs. However, the fact that these new series is 10th gen does not mean that it is the much-anticipated 10nm bas...
Abstract: It has been almost 10 months since the launch of AMD's third-generation Ryzen processors, and those chips have been dominating Intel's offerings. Intel was sitting there hoping that their Coffee Lake CPUs like the Core i9-9900K would compete against the b...
Published: 2020-05-22, Author: Darren , review by: futurefive.co.nz
Abstract: Intel's new 10th generation desktop CPUs are here. We've spent the last week taking a good look at the Core i5-10600K and the flagship i9-10900K. The i5 and i9 Comet Lake microprocessors are based on Intel's 2015 14nm SkyLake microarchitecture. Anyone thi...
Published: 2020-05-20, Author: Gordon , review by: pcworld.co.nz
If you were expecting Intel's 10th-gen to hammer Ryzen 3000 CPUs, you were wrong. Intel's creaky 14nm fabrication process can't fully stand up against AMD's (and TSMC's) 7nm, and Intel was never going to offer more multi-core performance than AMD's chips...
While the Core i9-10900K still leads the single-core performance by a significant margin, we cannot deny the fact that more games, software, and applications nowadays are slowing taking the advantage of the higher cores and threads count on the modern day...
Published: 2020-06-15, Author: John , review by: lowyat.net
There is little doubt that the Intel Core i9-10900K is powerful and definitely warrants consideration among gamers looking at high-end systems. As you've seen from the charts, the processor is more than capable of holding its own, but many of its selling...
More cores at higher clocks is a great combination, Chart-topping gaming performance, More overclocking headroom than the competition, Relatively easy to cool, Better value for money than previous generation
Power consumption is quite significant, Productivity performance is starting to lag behind competition
Intel holds the upper hand in terms of clock speed over the competition, and that benefit is clearly seen in older games. However the advantage quickly dissipate once you start playing modern titles which are more GPU-limited, in addition to being able to...
It's no secret that AMD has been stepping up their game in the CPU space since the introduction of their Ryzen processors. It's obvious that Intel is feeling the pressure from Team Red. Comet Lake-S is clearly a last-ditch effort from Team Blue to fend of...