in.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » Intel » Intel Core i7 2600K 3.4GHz Socket 1155



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Intel Core i7 2600K 3.4GHz Socket 1155

Testseek.com have collected 272 expert reviews of the Intel Core i7 2600K 3.4GHz Socket 1155 and the average rating is 87%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Intel Core i7 2600K 3.4GHz Socket 1155.
Award: Editor’s Choice January 2011
January 2011
 
(87%)
272 Reviews
Users
(97%)
1781 Reviews
87 0 100 272

The editors liked

  • 3.4 GHz frequency
  • Unlocked multiplier for further overclockability
  • 2nd Generation 32nm processor
  • Improved performance/power efficiency
  • CPU onboard graphics

The editors didn't like

  • Requires new motherboard
  • Intel's 3rd socket change in as many years
  • Base Clock is locked

 

Reviews

page 3 of 28
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2011-01-03, review by: ocaholic.ch.english

  • Abstract:  Sandy Bridge, this is the codename of Intels latest CPU generation which is based on an overworked Nehalem microarchitecture. We had the chance to test two of the upcoming CPUs, namely the Core i7 2600K and the Core i5 2500K. They both come with an imp...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-01-03, review by: tomshardware.co.uk

  • Abstract:  Although the processing cores in Intel’s Sandy Bridge architecture are decidedly similar to Nehalem, the integration of on-die graphics and a ring bus improves performance for mainstream users. Intel’s Quick Sync is this design’s secret weapon, though....

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2011-01-03, review by: computeractive.co.uk

  • This topoftherange processor is ready to be overclocked for even more speed,
  • As usual, you get more for your money from the middle of the range,
  • Great for the basis of a super-fast overclocked PC, but for most users the new i5 chips are better value ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2011-01-03, review by: expertreviews.co.uk

  • An incredibly powerful processor, that’s also power-efficient and easy to overclock. However, most should go with the cheaper i5-2500K. ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(100%)
 
  Published: 2011-01-03, review by: digitalversus.com

  • Performance with applications, Performance with video games, Turbo mode and Hyperthreading, Reasonable energy consumption, Integrated graphics can improve decoding/encoding video and support Bluray 3D
  • Integrated graphics don't support DirectX 11 which would have improved the bitrate in some games
  • Intel's latest generation of CPUs effectively picks up where the last one left off. Performance has been ratcheted up a notch and the energy consumption has gone down. This all-rounder is a real success....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(100%)
 
  Published: 2011-01-03, review by: kitguru.net

  • Performance Personified. A stunning new design....

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(95%)
 
  Published: 2011-01-03, review by: hardwareheaven.com

  • Looking first to the build quality and design of the new generation of Core processors we have a set of CPUs which have the usual high level of quality we have come to expect from Intel. It is very hard to damage a Core CPU when installing due to the ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(98%)
 
  Published: 2011-01-03, review by: kitguru.net

  • Intel’s latest architecture stands alone. Price, performance and all round flexibility mean that the second generation Core processors are going to be every enthusiast’s first choice for a long time to come. The bar has been raised, the challenge made...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(95%)
 
  Published: 2006-01-01, review by: hardwareheaven.com

  • Abstract:  Around 8 years ago AMD were going through a great phase where their FX range of Athlon CPUs were offering consumers industry leading performance in many scenarios. For example in games such as Unreal...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2021-10-12, Author: Steven , review by: techspot.com

  • All the data we've gathered provides real insight into how AMD and Intel CPU architectures compared over the past decade for gaming. We've seen AMD come from nowhere to often beating Intel, while the latter has made smaller steps in pure architecture term...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 3 of 28 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 28   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×