in.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Computers » CPUs » AMD » AMD Phenom 2 X4 965 Black Edition 125W 3.4GHz Socket AM3



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD Phenom 2 X4 965 Black Edition 125W 3.4GHz Socket AM3

Testseek.com have collected 62 expert reviews of the AMD Phenom 2 X4 965 Black Edition 125W 3.4GHz Socket AM3 and the average rating is 83%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Phenom 2 X4 965 Black Edition 125W 3.4GHz Socket AM3.
Award: Most Awarded November 2009
November 2009
 
(83%)
62 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
83 0 100 62

 

Reviews

page 2 of 7
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2009-11-04, review by: neoseeker.com

  • Clearly, this new revision benefits the consumers. It is awesome that AMD was able to fit the 3.4GHz quad-core in the 125W thermal envelope, as I had wished when I took a look at the first 965. As we have just seen, the power consumption is a big step...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-11-04, review by: hothardware.com

  • August marked the launch of AMD's current flagship desktop processor, the Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition. Today, we have a fresh revision of this CPU that brings some new features to the table. Unfortunately, these new aspects do not improve stock per...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-11-04, review by: tomshardware.com

  • Taken on its own, the new revision of AMD's Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition isn't particularly notable, but it was never meant to be. Taken in context, however, the chip plays its part in AMD's larger strategy of enabling an upgradable family o...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-11-04, review by: extremeoverclocking.com

  • There's really no downside to the new Phenom II X4 965 - 125W TDP model. The chip will overclock right around that 4 GHz zone, but it is just luck of the draw and each system setup will have an affect. We've seen numerous times in the past where t...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2009-11-04, review by: guru3d.com

  • AMD lately has been flamed a little bit about the high power consumption of their more high-end processors. Quite honestly, everybody in the high-end segment really doesn't care about 15 Watts extra. None the less, it's good to see AMD address the...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-11-04, Author: Jake , review by: pureoverclock.com

  • Today's examination of the Phenom II X4 965 was like deja vu all over again: same outward appearance, model, speed, and performance, but different stepping and TDP. Like identical twins, we had to look very carefully to tell the difference; in fact, w...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2009-11-04, review by: pcper.com

  • The Rev. C3 chips are not the second coming, but they are allowing AMD to be more competitive with Intel from a manufacturing and thermals standpoint. The extra overclocking room should make this popular with enthusiasts, and the price that these...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-11-04, review by: Bit-Tech.net

  • With some obvious and noteworthy improvements to the C3 revision of the Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition, it's now become a slightly more attractive alternative to the strong Intel competition.The vastly improved memory controller overclocking potential ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2009-11-04, review by: pcstats.com

  • AMD's initial quad-core AMD Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition processor was the fastest chip to date for the socket AM3 platform, and was quite affordable at the release price of $265 CDN (that price has now dropped to $195 as well). The 140W Phenom II X...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(81%)
 
  Published: 2009-11-04, review by: amdzone.com

  • Ultimately this isn't a game changer for Phenom II but it's nice to see AMD continue to make improvements to it's process and less power consumption is always better. Of course it may not be able to compete with the idle power ratings as Lynnfield but...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(96%)
    page 2 of 7 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×