in.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Cameras » Digital cameras » Canon EOS 1D Mark 4



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Canon EOS 1D Mark 4

Testseek.com have collected 51 expert reviews of the Canon EOS 1D Mark 4 and the average rating is 92%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Canon EOS 1D Mark 4.
Award: Highest Rated April 2010
April 2010
 
(92%)
51 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
92 0 100 51

The editors liked

  • Very well built with good environment sealing
  • Great low light performance
  • The sensor is noise free at ISO 3200
  • Excellent resolution and sharpness
  • Fast and responsive
  • Superb image capturing. High ISO speeds.

The editors didn't like

  • Expensive - some full frame cameras are cheaper
  • Bulky and heavy
  • Button placement not as good as the 7D
  • Not compatible with EF-S lenses
  • Expensive.

Show Show

 

Reviews

page 4 of 6
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2012-08-21, review by: techradar.com/au/

  • Fullframe sensor, Superb AF, Great exposure system, Excellent noise control
  • No exposure compensation button on vertical grip, Heavy, No rating button, No incamera HDR
  • Buying Guide Canon vs Nikon: which DSLR should you buy? As the most recent addition to Canon's professional DSLR series, the Canon EOS-1DX showcases the company's camera building capability and doesn't disappoint. In fact, in some respects it exceeds expe...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2010-01-01, Author: Margaret , review by: photoreview.com.au

  • Abstract:  Canon's EOS-ID Mark IV replaces the popular Mark III model at the top of the company's 'APS-H' professional DSLR line-up, adding Full HD video capture, higher resolution, a new image processor and an improved AF system to the features of the previous m...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(95%)
 
  Published: 2013-09-30, review by: technave.com

  • It's built to a standard to survive hard professional use while delivering images of outstanding quality under adverse conditions. It can shoot at 10 fps and in light levels so low that other cameras would yield images that were mostly noise. I found the ...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-01-17, Author: Adrian , review by: hardwarezone.com.ph

  • Abstract:  It's interesting to see how much technology has progressed through 2001 to 2010. Film still produced grainy images with ISO 800 rated film back then, and we now have pristinely clean photos at ISO 12,800. Without a doubt, the technology has been steadily ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2013-09-30, review by: technave.sg

  • It's built to a standard to survive hard professional use while delivering images of outstanding quality under adverse conditions. It can shoot at 10 fps and in light levels so low that other cameras would yield images that were mostly noise. I found the ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-02-09, review by: asiaone.com

  • This is a precision instrument for professionals. Start saving....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-01-17, review by: hardwarezone.com.sg

  • Abstract:  It's interesting to see how much technology has progressed through 2001 to 2010. Film still produced grainy images with ISO 800 rated film back then, and we now have pristinely clean photos at ISO 12,800. Without a doubt, the technology has been steadi...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2011-01-10, review by: tbreak.ae

  • Incredibly fast, Great AutoFocus, Superb HD video recording,
  • Expensive, Complex to understand

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2010-09-29, review by: Chip.de

  • Überzeugende Bildqualität, Sinnvolle Ausstattung, Sehr schnelle und lange Fotoserien
  • Rauscht im High-ISO-Bereich mehr als Nikon D3s
  • Canon ist mit der EOS 1D Mark IV eine überzeugende Kamera für Profis gelungen. Den Umstieg von der Mark III rechtfertigen neben der um 60 Prozent gestiegenen Auflösung bei gleichbleibender Schnelligkeitauch das viermal so hoch auflösende Display, die Vide...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(95%)
 
  Published: 2010-08-02, review by: Slashcam.de

  • Lesezeichen hinzufügen bei [noch keine Leserkommentare] [Kommentar schreiben] Kompetente Beratung bietet folgender Fachhändler:[nach oben]Weitere Artikel:Test: Samsung HMX-S10 Mo, 19.Juli 2010 Test: Samsung HMX-H204 Di, 13.Juli 2010 Test:...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 4 of 6 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×